2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.06.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality performance based regulation through designing reward and penalty scheme for electric distribution companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The amounts of reward and penalty are capped at the specific value to avoid unreasonable amounts of reward or penalty [4]. These caps are usually considered as percentage of the annual revenue of each DisCo [4].…”
Section: ) Reward and Penalty Capsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The amounts of reward and penalty are capped at the specific value to avoid unreasonable amounts of reward or penalty [4]. These caps are usually considered as percentage of the annual revenue of each DisCo [4].…”
Section: ) Reward and Penalty Capsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These caps are usually considered as percentage of the annual revenue of each DisCo [4]. In this paper, the ceilings are determined in such a way that the total reward or penalty from all reliability indices (in this paper, SAIFI and AENS) would be lower than 5 percent of the annual revenue of each DisCo.…”
Section: ) Reward and Penalty Capsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations