Quality, service level, or empire: which is the objective of the nonprofit arts firm?

Abstract

In this article, we examine the objectives of nonprofit arts firms. We approach this problem from both theoretical and empirical angles, building a structural model of arts nonprofit utility that distinguishes between the maximization of quality, the organization’s level of service, and its budget. We then construct an empirical method for testing which objective is evident in firm-level data. As an example application, we test the objectives of the managers of American public radio stations in the 1990s, finding that about half of stations have discernible objectives. The data show service is not an objective for about 30% of the stations; quality can be ruled out for 49%; and budget is rejected for 69%. In addition, large stations are harder to classify by objective than small ones are. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007Public radio, Charitable giving, Managerial objectives, Z11, L31,

“Corporate” governance in nonprofit organizations

“…The seminal paper here is Steinberg (1986). For an extension, see Brooks and Ondrich (2007). These methods are designed to measure organizational objectives by looking at fundraising policies and deriving from them the balance of power between board and manager.…”

Kids or Cash? Exploring Charter School Responses to Declining Government Revenues

“…In the spirit of Steinberg (), we model charter schools as a not‐for‐profit firm with “utility” affected by service quality and budget size. Following Brooks and Ondrich ()'s modeling of not‐for‐profit institutions such as public radio and art museums, we add quality or reputation as an argument of the charter schools' utility, because quality is a vital element in the prestige and performance of schools. For charter schools, the budget is generated by federal and state funding tied to student enrollment and by private donations secured through fundraising efforts.…”