Quantifiable Hearing and No ABR

Worthington, Don W.; Peters, Jon F.

doi:10.1097/00003446-198009000-00009

Cited by 93 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Anecdotal evidence, beginning with the first auditory brainstem response papers to identify the condition in children (Davis and Hirsch, 1979;Worthington and Peters, 1980), has consistently suggested that young subjects with prelingual onset of AN/AD are at risk of significant perceptual problems and delays in speech and language development.…”

Section: Speech Perception In Children Withmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-synchrony and Its Perceptual Consequences

Rance

2005

Trends in Amplification

228

186

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony is a form of hearing impairment in which cochlear outer hair cell function is spared but neural transmission in the auditory pathway is disordered. This condition, or group of conditions with a common physiologic profile, accounts for approximately 7% of permanent childhood hearing loss and a significant (but as yet undetermined) proportion of adult impairment. This paper presents an overview of the mechanisms underlying auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony-type hearing loss and the clinical profile for affected patients. In particular it examines the perceptual consequences of auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony, which are quite different from those associated with sensorineural hearing loss, and considers currently available, and future management options.

show abstract

Section: Speech Perception In Children Withmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-synchrony and Its Perceptual Consequences

Rance

2005

Trends in Amplification

228

186

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Considering the possible PET process, similarly to the case of Ru* to BQ, we evaluated the thermodynamic feasibility of electron transfer in Ru* to TAPP using the Rehm-Weller equation [44]. With the reduction potential of TAPP being −1.37 V [52], G o is estimated to be +0.13 eV for the PET from Ru* to TAPP and +0.29 eV for the PET from TAPP* to Ru. These results indicate that we can exclude the PET process between Ru and TAPP.…”

Section: Ru-tapp Associationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Photoinduced energy and electron transfer in rubrene–benzoquinone and rubrene–porphyrin systems

Khan¹,

Abbas²,

Aly³

et al. 2014

Chemical Physics Letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A word of warning is in order: subsequent ABR testing in isolation is hazardous. Behavioral and impedance testing should be used in concert with ABR to determine auditory function (6,46,48).…”

Section: Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Current Status of Auditory Brainstem Response Testing in Neonatal Populations

Cox

1984

Pediatr Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryThe use of auditory brainstem response (ABR) for assessment of hearing in the neonate has not been without challenge. Although numerous articles have appeared, agreement regarding the utility of neonatal ABR testing does not exist. In review of the current studies and commentaries, a clear majority are favorable to neonatal ABR testing. These studies along with current test procedures are discussed. (38); procedures for the assessment of that potential were initiated. Since 1975, the research reported in the literature has grown exponentially each year. In spite of the large and increasing amount of research reported, sever! issues have remained unresolved, viz., the applicability, reliability, and validity of neonatal ABR testing. In fact, because of these and other factors, some authors have begun to seriously question using ABR with neonates (13,35,42).. The need for early identification of infants with hearing loss is apparent. Normal language, learning, and social skill acquisition is contingent upon hearing. Although the incidence of hearing impairment in the general neonatal population is relatively low (0,26%) (41), in NICU neonates the incidence is considerably higher (2-10%) (16, 39). Furthermore, the improved survival rate of neonates born weighing less than 1500 g (19, 31) has increased the pool of infants in which a high incidence of hearing impairment is seen (16). Because the need for early identification of hearing loss does exist and the current procedures that could identify hearing impairment in the neonate are open to question (ABR), a critical review of ABR testing is in order. The purpose of this article is to summarize the current ABR literature, both pro and con, and to draw conclusions regarding its use based on the literature and the experience of the writer. The summary will not attempt to review early ABR literature primarily due to excellent reviews that are already published. The interested reader, however, would find Downs (13) very thorough.The current literature pertinent to ABR testing of neonates and NICU populations is discussed and from several aspects (5)(6)(7) II,12,17,20,25,34,36,47). Weber (47) The influence of various factors on the ABR have been explored

show abstract

Quantifiable Hearing and No ABR

Cited by 93 publications

References 0 publications

Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-synchrony and Its Perceptual Consequences

Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-synchrony and Its Perceptual Consequences

Photoinduced energy and electron transfer in rubrene–benzoquinone and rubrene–porphyrin systems

The Current Status of Auditory Brainstem Response Testing in Neonatal Populations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About