2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification and modelling of organic micropollutant removal by reverse osmosis (RO) drinking water treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The robustness of combined drinking water treatments against emerging substances has been studied for several years in the Netherlands [3,4]. All the measurements in this study were carried out in a pilot plant in which 49 OMPs were dosed, and the removal was measured.…”
Section: Omps Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The robustness of combined drinking water treatments against emerging substances has been studied for several years in the Netherlands [3,4]. All the measurements in this study were carried out in a pilot plant in which 49 OMPs were dosed, and the removal was measured.…”
Section: Omps Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, the removal of OMPs has been the subject of study for researchers [2,3,53] as it is important to eliminate them from drinking water with appropriate treatment technology. Recently various technologies have been used to eliminate OMPs from drinking water, such as reverse osmosis and nanofiltration [4,5], advanced oxidation processes [3], and activated carbon adsorption [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical examples of these additional treatment steps can be divided into three types. Firstly, adsorption processes such as activated carbon which can, for instance, be applied in powdered or granular form (Zietzschmann et al, 2016); secondly, oxidation processes such as ozonation (Ekblad et al, 2021); and thirdly, membrane processes such as reverse osmosis and nanofiltration (Ebrahimzadeh et al, 2021). Combinations of these also provide an option to remove OMPs from the wastewater, e.g., ozonation in combination with activated carbon filtration (Guillossou et al, 2020), sand filtration (Hollender et al, 2009) or zeolite filtration (Fu et al, 2021a;Fu et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pollution from pharmaceuticals observed in the aquatic environment, and its potential risk for humans and the wider environment, have recently received significant attention among the global scientific community [1][2][3]. After pharmaceuticals are injected into the human body, they are excreted through the metabolism via urination [4,5], and then enter sewage networks or septic tanks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several studies concerning the removal of pharmaceuticals from water have shown that both conventional drinking water and wastewater treatments have limitations in effectively removing pharmaceuticals, and thus the development of advanced treatment steps with high implementation costs are essential [38,39]. However, the results of some studies proved that advanced water treatments are not always a robust treatment for the removal of some pharmaceuticals, such as carbamazepine, from wastewater or drinking water, in which residual quantities may remain [1,40]. Therefore, understanding how the population within an urban wastewater agglomeration uses pharmaceuticals, which enter the wastewater or drinking water treatment plants, may provide important insights to enhance the control of the volume of these compounds [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%