2010
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.146290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Fetal DNA by Use of Methylation-Based DNA Discrimination

Abstract: BACKGROUND:Detection of circulating cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal plasma has been used in noninvasive prenatal diagnostics. Most applications rely on the qualitative detection of fetal nucleic acids to determine the genetic makeup of the fetus. This method leads to an analytic dilemma, because test results from samples that do not contain fetal DNA or are contaminated with maternal cellular DNA can be misleading. We developed a multiplex approach to analyze regions that are hypermethylated in place… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But it is pivotal to know by which method fetal fraction is measured and how precise the measured value is. To date, there are four concepts to determine fetal fraction: quantitation of Y-chromosomal sequences [17], copy number differences [18], differential methylation [19] and polymorphic SNP allele dosage [20]. Quantifying Y-chromosomal cfDNA is only feasible in pregnancies with a male fetus and constitutively underestimates fetal fraction in comparison to a SNP allele dosage method [21,22].…”
Section: Methods Of Niptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it is pivotal to know by which method fetal fraction is measured and how precise the measured value is. To date, there are four concepts to determine fetal fraction: quantitation of Y-chromosomal sequences [17], copy number differences [18], differential methylation [19] and polymorphic SNP allele dosage [20]. Quantifying Y-chromosomal cfDNA is only feasible in pregnancies with a male fetus and constitutively underestimates fetal fraction in comparison to a SNP allele dosage method [21,22].…”
Section: Methods Of Niptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods work for both male and female fetuses, but are indirect approaches which exploit characteristics that vary depending on the origin of the DNA. For example, the average length of the cfDNA fragments in a sample has been used to estimate the fetal fraction (fetal fragments are, on average, shorter than those of maternal origin [22]) as has the presence of methylation (fetal fragments are more likely to be methylated than maternal ones [23]). Using SNPs to distinguish fetal from maternal DNA allows a more direct assessment of the proportion of the DNA that is of placental origin.…”
Section: Fetal Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is essential for further analysis to implement strategies to measure the quantity of the fetal DNA [4,22]. For instance, the fetal fraction could be determined based on differential methylation [24].…”
Section: Quantification Of Cell-free Fetal Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%