Methane hydrate concentrated zones (MHCZs) have become targets for energy exploration along continental margins worldwide. In 2013, exploratory drilling in the eastern Nankai Trough at Daini Atsumi Knoll confirmed that MHCZs tens of meters thick occur directly above bottom simulating reflections imaged in seismic data. This study uses 3-dimensional (3D) seismic and borehole data collected from the Kumano Basin offshore Japan to identify analogous MHCZs. Our survey region is located~100 km southwest of the Daini Atsumi Knoll, site of the first offshore gas hydrate production trial. Here we provide a detailed analysis of the gas hydrate system within our survey area of the Kumano forearc including: (1) the 3D spatial distribution of bottom simulating reflections; (2) a thickness map of potential MHCZs; and (3) a volumetric gas-in-place estimate for these MHCZs using constraints from our seismic interpretations as well as previously collected borehole data. There is evidence for two distinct zones of concentrated gas hydrate 10-90 m thick, and we estimate that the amount of gas-in-place potentially locked up in these MHCZs is 1.9-46.3 trillion cubic feet with a preferred estimate of 15.8 trillion cubic feet. Keywords: gas hydrates; Kumano Basin; bottom simulating reflections; methane hydrate exploration; 3D seismic interpretation; Nankai Trough
IntroductionNatural gas hydrates (GH) are crystalline inclusion compounds that form within the pore space of marine sediments along continental margins worldwide. These hydrate deposits are stable at specific pressure-temperature relationships, host highly compressed gas molecules (most commonly methane), and are proposed to be the largest dynamic reservoir of organic carbon on this planet [1][2][3]. GHs have enticed global interest for several reasons including climate change and potential slope stability hazards, but primarily because these deposits could prove to be an unconventional energy resource [3,4]. At the exploration stage, it is important to develop systematic GH exploration methods that consider gas source, migration mechanisms into the hydrate stability field, zones of free gas, indicators of gas hydrate accumulation, and at least a first order volumetric gas-in-place estimate for apparent zones of concentrated hydrates [5,6].Seismic imaging is an important tool for identifying GH because both GH and free gas alter the physical properties of marine sediments, which will in turn affect the travel path and attenuation of the seismic wavelet [7][8][9]. Concentrated hydrate deposits tend to form at and just above the base of gas hydrate stability (BGHS). This results in a sharp contrast in mechanical properties at the phase boundary between GH saturated layers overlying a zone where free gas, water, and potentially non-cementing hydrate occupy the pore space [10]. This contrast in physical properties is expressed in seismic data as bottom simulating reflections (BSRs), and BSRs remain our strongest remotely sensed indicator to infer the presence of GH [11...