2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of fugitive emissions from an oil sands tailings pond by eddy covariance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S4 (d)) covered a workers' lodge and parking lots, and CH4 emissions and diurnal variation were close to zero. The lack 250 of a diurnal variation of CH4 EC flux observed when the wind was from the pond in this study was similar to the diurnal variation of CH4 EC flux at another tailings pond reported by Zhang et al (2019).…”
Section: Eddy Covariance Fluxsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…S4 (d)) covered a workers' lodge and parking lots, and CH4 emissions and diurnal variation were close to zero. The lack 250 of a diurnal variation of CH4 EC flux observed when the wind was from the pond in this study was similar to the diurnal variation of CH4 EC flux at another tailings pond reported by Zhang et al (2019).…”
Section: Eddy Covariance Fluxsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Results from this study and Zhang et al (2019) suggest that average tailings pond CH4 emission extrapolated from a few individual flux chamber measurements may significantly underestimate or overestimate fluxes relative to area-320 averaging micrometeorological measurements.…”
Section: Flux Chamber Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For CO 2 emission flux, the average was 4.32 µmol/(m 2sec) and 3.22 µmol/(m 2 -sec) for day 1 and day 2, respectively ( Figures 9 and 10 and Table 1). These emissions fluxes are of the same order of magnitude as determined using eddy covariance technique at a similar lagoon (30min average data over 3 months in summer 2013) (Zhang et al, 2014). It is apparent that stronger wind speed on day 1 corresponds to higher emission fluxes of CH 4 and CO 2 from the lagoon as compared to day 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%