2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of HBsAg in nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients treated for chronic hepatitis B with entecavir with or without tenofovir in the BE-LOW study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with serum HBV RNA levels, serum HBsAg levels correlated well with intrahepatic cccDNA levels at 96 weeks after NUC therapy (r ϭ 0.39, P Ͻ 0.01). Previous studies also identified a role of serum HBsAg in predicting treatment response during NUC therapy, and a higher HBsAg level at the end of NUC treatment was an independent predictor for posttreatment HBV relapse (18)(19)(20), which strongly supported our results indicating that serum HBsAg levels correlated well with intrahepatic cccDNA levels and that the levels might reflect the activity of cccDNA after NUC treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Compared with serum HBV RNA levels, serum HBsAg levels correlated well with intrahepatic cccDNA levels at 96 weeks after NUC therapy (r ϭ 0.39, P Ͻ 0.01). Previous studies also identified a role of serum HBsAg in predicting treatment response during NUC therapy, and a higher HBsAg level at the end of NUC treatment was an independent predictor for posttreatment HBV relapse (18)(19)(20), which strongly supported our results indicating that serum HBsAg levels correlated well with intrahepatic cccDNA levels and that the levels might reflect the activity of cccDNA after NUC treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…38 The effect of NA in decreasing HBsAg levels was assessed by Zoulim et al, and they showed a decrease in HBsAg levels in NA-naïve patients receiving ETV (n = 182) with or without TDF (n = 197). 39 The range of the decrease in HBsAg levels between baseline and 96 weeks of ETV treatment was larger among HBeAg-positive patients than HBeAg-negative patients (0.91 IU/mL vs 0.13 logIU/mL). Furthermore, in the assessment according to HBV genotype, the range of the decrease in HBsAg levels in HBeAg-positive patients was the largest among genotype A rather than genotype B, C, or D (1.83, 0.76, 0.26, and 0.46 logIU/mL, respectively), while in HBeAg-negative patients, the decrease in HBsAg levels was rarely different between HBV genotypes (0.24, 0.28, 0.18, and 0.02 logIU/mL, respectively).…”
Section: Impact Of Nucleos(t)ide Analogue For Hccmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This combination did not provide added value in terms of HBsAg kinetics. 123 In a second double-blind study, HBeAg-positive treatment naïve patients with high HBV DNA and normal ALT levels were randomly assigned to either TDF plus placebo or a combination of TDF plus emtricitabine for 192 weeks. 124 At week 192, 55%…”
Section: Na Plus Na Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%