various microfluidic devices have been routinely employed. However, in these approaches, there is either a high chance of damaging the cells while detaching the adherent cells from the surfaces, or isolation of individual cells from the adherent cell culture is not at all possible. Table 1 lists the drawbacks and challenges associated with these cell sorting techniques. Recently, atomic force microscope (AFM) has emerged as a significant tool to study microorganisms and mammalian cells in real time. This is due to its compatibility with the physiological conditions of the cells. [3] AFM allows the bioimaging of cells with various degrees of resolution, from whole cells [4] down to individual molecules. [5] Using force-curve based imaging, Alsteens et al. revealed single bacteriophages extruding from the surface of bacteria, [6] whereas our group was able to image nanostructures termed microvilli on the surface of T cells. [7] With the introduction of high-speed AFMs, Yamashita et al. were able to follow the diffusion of single molecules on the surface of living bacterial cells in real time. [8] Valuable biophysical and structural information can be achieved down to a single-cell level by means of high-resolution imaging and force spectroscopy. [9] In force spectroscopy experiments using AFM, a cell is directly attached to the cantilever apex with a biocompatible glue (e.g., polydopamine (PDA)). However, since the cell is irreversibly bound to the AFM probe, each functionalized cantilever can be utilized with only one cell for manipulation. It is, therefore, challenging to perform serial and rapid measurement of a reasonable number of cells; this makes it a time-consuming and elaborate process to address a statistical distribution. For injecting biomolecules such as dyes, enzymes or nanoparticles into single living cells, various approaches such as nano-fountain probes, [10] nanoneedles, [11] and carbon nanotubes [12] have been used. However, these approaches lack precise handling for local dispensing of fluid and are limited to the handling of very small volumes (on the order of attoliters (aLs) up to 50 femtoliters (fLs)). Moreover, using these approaches, a relatively long period of time is required to perform intracellular injection. With the advancement of technologies, it has become relatively easier to address these problems in a more controlled manner. Conventional AFM has been integrated with microfluidics to overcome these limitations. [13] This bioanalytical tool is known as a fluidic force microscope or FluidFM, which was This review describes the potential of FluidFM technology and its implementation in studying the interface between a single cell (prokaryote or eukaryote) and a surface or a surrounding area. A combination of microfluidics with conventional atomic force microscope (AFM) makes this platform efficient to address challenges associated with various biomolecular systems and biophysical activities down to single-cell levels. Upon regulating the pressure through a microchanneled cantilever v...