1983
DOI: 10.1139/b83-256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of leaf shape with a microcomputer and Fourier transform

Abstract: Using a microcomputer, digitizing surface, and a Fourier transform, we present an automated, precise, and repeatable method to trace, quantify, and reconstruct the shape of flat leaves and reduce the information to a few coefficients. These coefficients can be analyzed statistically to reconstruct average leaves, to access symmetry, to measure leaf complexity, to develop leaf shape signatures, and to allow shape analysis to proceed independently of surface area. We provide guidelines for determining if leaves … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf shape was quantified with a leaf dissection index (defined as perimeter=[2√ (area p)]; Kincaid and Schneider 1983), measured on two leaves per plant using ImageJ (Rasband 2011). Specific leaf area (SLA; area/dry weight) came from disks of 0.55 cm diameter punched from the same two leaves and weighed after 48 h drying at 607C (to 0.001 mg precision; disks were 0.3 cm diameter for the 670 The American Naturalist…”
Section: Measuring Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf shape was quantified with a leaf dissection index (defined as perimeter=[2√ (area p)]; Kincaid and Schneider 1983), measured on two leaves per plant using ImageJ (Rasband 2011). Specific leaf area (SLA; area/dry weight) came from disks of 0.55 cm diameter punched from the same two leaves and weighed after 48 h drying at 607C (to 0.001 mg precision; disks were 0.3 cm diameter for the 670 The American Naturalist…”
Section: Measuring Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole leaves were digitally photographed using a SteReo Lumar V12 stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at 6.4× magnification, and the images were analyzed with AxioVision Rel 4.8 (Carl Zeiss) and leaf length, width, area, perimeter and shape coefficient (defined according to [25]) were determined.…”
Section: Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. From the primary data the following variables were derived: 1) dissection index (DI) according to KINCAID and SCHNEIDER (1983), MCLELLAN (1993MCLELLAN ( , 2000: Dissection index is sensitive to different aspects of shape. Typically, the dissection index of an entire leaf is slightly larger than 1.0, and more deeply lobed or serrated leaves produce larger values (KINCAID and SCHNEIDER 1983).…”
Section: Morphological Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%