2014
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of liver iron with MRI: State of the art and remaining challenges

Abstract: Liver iron overload is the histological hallmark of hereditary hemochromatosis and transfusional hemosiderosis, and can also occur in chronic hepatopathies. Iron overload can result in liver damage, with the eventual development of cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Assessment of liver iron levels is necessary for detection and quantitative staging of iron overload, and monitoring of iron-reducing treatments. This article discusses the need for non-invasive assessment of liver iron, and rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
272
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
(243 reference statements)
1
272
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanoliposomal carriers may thus exhibit comparably faster drug release rates than therapeutic nanoparticles with a more erosive, slower release mechanism (27,43), which could possibly explain the lack of correlation between lesion response to nal-IRI and late binding events of FMX in this study. R2 and R2 Ã mapping are accepted clinical tools for evaluating tissue iron concentrations, both for iron overload disorders (44,45) and for tracking of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (18,24,46). To enable accurate lesion FMX assessments, baseline MRI signals were subtracted from later time points, and FMX phantom reference was used with all scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoliposomal carriers may thus exhibit comparably faster drug release rates than therapeutic nanoparticles with a more erosive, slower release mechanism (27,43), which could possibly explain the lack of correlation between lesion response to nal-IRI and late binding events of FMX in this study. R2 and R2 Ã mapping are accepted clinical tools for evaluating tissue iron concentrations, both for iron overload disorders (44,45) and for tracking of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (18,24,46). To enable accurate lesion FMX assessments, baseline MRI signals were subtracted from later time points, and FMX phantom reference was used with all scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the best curve fitting and number of echoes strategy have yet to be defined and the number of echoes might be smaller for PDFF quantification without decreasing accuracy [37], our 12-echo approach improves R2* quantification. Of importance, the first echo and the echo spacing should be as short as possible to better capture the signal decay in cases of severe iron overload [38]. 3 T MR magnets have higher signal-to-noise ratio and overall quality than 1.5 T units, being advantageous for abdominal imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement for manual interaction in some of the current analysis methods adds a subjective factor which, although often clinically insignificant in myocardial T2* measurements 27, may present challenges in liver T2* determination 9, 19, 28. Iron overload is usually first found in the liver 29.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%