2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0709-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of mycorrhizal water uptake via high-resolution on-line water content sensors

Abstract: The benefits of mycorrhizas for host plants are well known for a large number of species. However, experimental evaluations of the hyphal contribution to the total water uptake and the assessment of the bulk flow velocity in the hyphae are so far contradictory. Barley (Hordeum vulgaris L. Scarlet) with the inoculum Glomus intraradices was grown in a split plant-hyphal chamber with a 5 mm air gap. During the preparation of the chambers with a loamy-silt soil, water content sensors were inserted in each of the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 72 h, hydraulic redistribution through hyphae had resulted in an average water flux of 67 μL·cm ) (27). In general, passive mass flow is considered as the main mechanism of water transport in fungal hyphae (28), but active transport mechanisms for water might also be involved, such as cytoplasmic streaming (with velocities of 0.03-0.05 cm·min −1 in hyphae) (29), vesicles moved by motor proteins (up to 0.02 cm·min −1 ) (30), and vacuolar pathways (about 0.005 cm·min −1 ) (31).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 72 h, hydraulic redistribution through hyphae had resulted in an average water flux of 67 μL·cm ) (27). In general, passive mass flow is considered as the main mechanism of water transport in fungal hyphae (28), but active transport mechanisms for water might also be involved, such as cytoplasmic streaming (with velocities of 0.03-0.05 cm·min −1 in hyphae) (29), vesicles moved by motor proteins (up to 0.02 cm·min −1 ) (30), and vacuolar pathways (about 0.005 cm·min −1 ) (31).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulties in clearly interpreting the physiological and biochemical outcomes of AM symbiosis under drought conditions are due to the nature of AM symbiosis, because differentiating the effects of roots alone or of AM fungi alone from their combined effects is difficult (Ruth et al 2011). This distinction becomes crucial when investigating the plant-fungus water relations where isolating the direct effect of AM symbiosis and understanding the real contribution of the AM fungi to the water balance of entire plants are also difficult.…”
Section: Belowground Role Of Root Systems and Am Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AM fungi can directly influence host plant water absorption through different mechanisms: Hyphae explore soil pores inaccessible to plants since their diameter is tenfold smaller than that of root hairs (Smith et al 2010); they can facilitate the formation of stable aggregates in the soil thus increasing soil moisture retention properties (Auge et al 2001), and they can transport 375 to 760 nL of water per hour (Faber et al 1991), accounting for up to 20 % of the total water absorbed by plant roots (Ruth et al 2011). On the other hand, root hydraulic conductivity (L), which provides information about the plant's capacity to take up water from the soil (Gallardo et al 1996), usually decreases under drought stress, but this diminution may be partially avoided by AM symbiosis (El-Mesbahi et al 2012;Bárzana et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%