2017
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction: A systematic review

Abstract: For quantifying noninvasive fat reduction, all available methods had significant limitations: photographic comparisons were subjective; circumference or caliper measurements were confounded; ultrasound was operator dependent; MRI was expensive; computed models and simulations were in early development. As new technologies are developed, the need for reliable, accurate and practical measures of subcutaneous fat will increase. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:96-110, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in favor of the Cryolipolysis group (P < 0.001) regarding the effect of Cryolipolysis on waist-to-hip ratio and subcutaneous fat thickness measured by ultrasonography. Although the accuracy of waist circumference and the waist-to-hip ratio, as well as the ultrasonography in reflecting the percentage of fat reduction was variable and dependent on the evaluator experience, they still were easy, valid, reliable, and accurate tools to measure the thickness of the fat [41]. This positive effect of Cryolipolysis in the current study were assumed to be due to its reshaping and re-contouring effects, which was approved by many studies [19,[41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in favor of the Cryolipolysis group (P < 0.001) regarding the effect of Cryolipolysis on waist-to-hip ratio and subcutaneous fat thickness measured by ultrasonography. Although the accuracy of waist circumference and the waist-to-hip ratio, as well as the ultrasonography in reflecting the percentage of fat reduction was variable and dependent on the evaluator experience, they still were easy, valid, reliable, and accurate tools to measure the thickness of the fat [41]. This positive effect of Cryolipolysis in the current study were assumed to be due to its reshaping and re-contouring effects, which was approved by many studies [19,[41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate quantification of volumetric fat reduction is difficult (9,10). Auh and Alum (11) note that while MRI is the current "gold standard", it is costly and may not be readily available. Two dimensional photographs are commonly used as "proof" of outcome, but patient position, lighting, change in patient weight, Downloaded by [University of California, San Diego] at 09:33 02 April 2016 clothing, and a difference in camera operator personnel are noted confounding variables.…”
Section: Discussion Many Noninvasive Devices Claim Subcutaneous Fat mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although ultrasound measures have been used by other studies, limitations like subjectivity of landmarks assignments and dependence on operator experience are highlighted. However, a gold standard method is not yet defined 8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on efficacy and safety of cryolipolysis have become more frequent in the literature, 8 however, the studies include, in general, small sample sizes and different characteristics may be related with an unsuccessful treatment 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation