2017
DOI: 10.5154/r.inagbi.2017.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the error of digital terrain models derived from images acquired with UAV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the MAE and the RMSE, measure the accuracy of the estimate regarding the observed data. The RMSE penalizes errors of greater magnitude, making it more sensitive to these errors than the MAE is [15]. The RB allows knowing if the CMORPH algorithm underestimates or overestimates precipitation.…”
Section: Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the MAE and the RMSE, measure the accuracy of the estimate regarding the observed data. The RMSE penalizes errors of greater magnitude, making it more sensitive to these errors than the MAE is [15]. The RB allows knowing if the CMORPH algorithm underestimates or overestimates precipitation.…”
Section: Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although UAVs have significantly increased their capacity to collect data in the field with higher density (Dering et al, 2019), it has been pointed out that the use of additional tools improves the precision of the results (Jimenez et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the use of Agisoft Meta Shape software and ground control points (GCP) added to the high-quality images contribute to improving the precision of the DEM obtained (Jimenez et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations