2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of uncertainty in predicting building energy consumption: A stochastic approach

Abstract: Traditional building energy consumption calculation methods are characterised by rough approaches providing approximate figures with high and unknown levels of uncertainty. Lack of reliable energy resources and increasing concerns about climate change call for improved predictive tools.A new approach for the prediction of building energy consumption is presented. The approach quantifies the uncertainty of building energy consumption by means of stochastic differential equations. The approach is applied to a ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, about 100 of the 1009 input parameters of a building model had statistical significance (Eisenhower et al 2011). Brohus et al (2012) quantified the uncertainty of building energy consumption using stochastic differential equations and applied the method to an arbitrary number of loads and zones in a building. Burhenne et al (2013) proposed a cost-benefit analysis using an MCA with Monte Carlo filtering to find which variables drive model uncertainty.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, about 100 of the 1009 input parameters of a building model had statistical significance (Eisenhower et al 2011). Brohus et al (2012) quantified the uncertainty of building energy consumption using stochastic differential equations and applied the method to an arbitrary number of loads and zones in a building. Burhenne et al (2013) proposed a cost-benefit analysis using an MCA with Monte Carlo filtering to find which variables drive model uncertainty.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid physical-statistical approach is described in [68], where stochastic parameters are introduced into the physical model and the statistical time series model is formulated to reflect model 10 uncertainties, while a methodology based on Bayesian calibration of the normative EN ISO 13790 energy models is presented in [69], focusing on model parameter uncertainty quantification to generate probabilistic predictions of retrofit performances. The uncertainty is also quantified in [70] by means of stochastic differential equations applied to a general heat balance for an arbitrary number of loads and zones in a building, to determine the dynamic thermal response under random 15 conditions. Uncertainty in energy consumption due to actual weather and building operational practices is investigated in [71], using simulation-based analysis of a medium size office building and Monte Carlo sampling of possible parameter combinations.…”
Section: Grey Box / Hybrid Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taylor decomposition is a simple method that cannot be used in the case of a very non-smooth model because of the risk of having inaccurate approximations and incorrect results. Brohus [20] applied Taylor decomposition to determine the uncertainty of heat losses through natural ventilation by coupling the local sensitivity method with a CFD model. These results are compared with a Monte Carlo approach, and there is no significant difference.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%