1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1993.tb00930.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantified evaluation of agricultural soil capability at the local scale: a GIS‐assisted case study from Ontario, Canada

Abstract: Abstract. Rural agricultural areas in southern Ontario, Canada, with potential for aggregate extraction have become a focus of conflict over proposed land use change. Geophysical and soil physical field measurements were used to map soil variation for quantitative land evaluation at the farm level. Apparent electrical conductivity of terrain was shown to be strongly correlated with depth to the groundwater table on two separate test sites. A digital terrain model was used to create thematic maps of the predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many situations, where soil maps or soil classifications are useful in agronomic decision-making processes, such as land use planning or the adjustment of fertilizer rates according to soil types in a region. Soil maps are also used in many land evaluation and crop growth simulation studies (Wolf et al, 1989;Chinene, 1992;McBride & Bober, 1993), but quantitative error assessment in such GIs-supported modelling activities requires estimates of the within-map unit variance (Burrough, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many situations, where soil maps or soil classifications are useful in agronomic decision-making processes, such as land use planning or the adjustment of fertilizer rates according to soil types in a region. Soil maps are also used in many land evaluation and crop growth simulation studies (Wolf et al, 1989;Chinene, 1992;McBride & Bober, 1993), but quantitative error assessment in such GIs-supported modelling activities requires estimates of the within-map unit variance (Burrough, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%