2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying accommodation to prosthesis interventions in persons with lower limb loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to previous work and recommendations, the additional acclimation did not markedly influence the walk test results. 16,21 Finally, although the ATK improved mobility performance and decreased instances of knee instability, a cosmetically acceptable finish was more difficult to achieve. Hence, the provision of prosthetic technology to places such as Cambodia must consider not only functionality but also cosmesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to previous work and recommendations, the additional acclimation did not markedly influence the walk test results. 16,21 Finally, although the ATK improved mobility performance and decreased instances of knee instability, a cosmetically acceptable finish was more difficult to achieve. Hence, the provision of prosthetic technology to places such as Cambodia must consider not only functionality but also cosmesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To allow for further acclimation, participants used the ATK knee prosthesis at home for at least 1 month. 21 Data collection was repeated after 1 month of use (ATK1). During this visit, participants were given the choice of reverting to the ICRC knee or continuing with the ATK and attending follow-up data collection sessions 6 and 12 months later.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That four of five participants were accustomed to using microprocessor-controlled devices may have further increased the requirement for acclimation. Acclimation was not quantified and comparison with any reported acclimation periods empirically tested in other individuals (see e.g., [ 30 ] for technique and sample data) would not be appropriate. However, the trends in the variables we report, which were evident regardless of the adoption of compensatory strategies that varied across participants and across conditions, lend weight to our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same study prosthetist performed all work on subjects' prostheses. Details of the protocol design have been described previously [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%