2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-0499-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying combination effects of project management practices on cost performance

Abstract: This paper presents an analysis method that quantifies the relationship between project management practices and the cost performance of construction projects. The analysis method includes a series of analysis procedures and methods: data measurement and transformation, contingency table analysis, logistic regression, and a composite index.Step-by-step analysis procedures and methods are described along with the data obtained from 143 owner projects to examine the effect of nineteen project management practice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondents were also provided with a series of statements relevant to the practices of Whilst there appears to be a wide recognition of progress tracking as a necessary project control mechanism, the practice of using the actual cost or project expenditure to represent progress can be considered a more 'traditional' project management practice (Suk et al, 2016) that embodies what exactly EVM is moving away from. The distinction of the earned value (progress to be achieved relative to the budget) from the actual cost (the actual project expenditure to date) in EVM offers a more accurate representation of the progress achieved so far whilst the use of project expenditure or actual cost alone can be misleading in many cases (Sutrisna et al 2012).…”
Section: Construction Progress and Actual Cost Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Respondents were also provided with a series of statements relevant to the practices of Whilst there appears to be a wide recognition of progress tracking as a necessary project control mechanism, the practice of using the actual cost or project expenditure to represent progress can be considered a more 'traditional' project management practice (Suk et al, 2016) that embodies what exactly EVM is moving away from. The distinction of the earned value (progress to be achieved relative to the budget) from the actual cost (the actual project expenditure to date) in EVM offers a more accurate representation of the progress achieved so far whilst the use of project expenditure or actual cost alone can be misleading in many cases (Sutrisna et al 2012).…”
Section: Construction Progress and Actual Cost Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project management has established itself as a mature multi-discipline profession that continuously grows with its distinctive tools and techniques in managing projects (Winch 2002;Suk et al 2016). These well-established tools and techniques have been specifically designed to support project managers in monitoring and controlling activities at any point in time during the course of the project (PMI 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acuerdo a Suk, Chi, Mulva, Caldas, and An (2017) para mejorar el desempeño de proyectos es necesario identificar los mejores atributos de gestión. En este sentido, los factores más importantes que inciden en cada apartado, se obtuvieron a partir de las respuestas del cuestionario y mediante el índice de severidad de Mendenhall, la tabla 3 muestra los 10 factores más relevantes.…”
Section: Elaboración Propia Con Base En Las Respuestas De Los Cuestiounclassified
“…O modelo proposto permite avaliar de forma mais realista o desempenho prospectivo dos projetos e, assim, ajudar na tomada de decisões e ações preventivas. Suk et al (2016) apresentam um método de análise que quantifica a relação, a partir de 143 projetos analisados, entre práticas de gerenciamento de projetos e o desempenho de custos de projetos de construção. Examinam o efeito de 19 práticas de gerenciamento de projetos no desempenho de custos, revelando níveis mínimos de implementação de práticas de gerenciamento de projetos para um melhor desempenho de custo e quantificam os efeitos combinados das práticas de gerenciamento de projetos no desempenho de custo.…”
Section: Desempenho De Projetosunclassified