2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-022-01618-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying discrepancies in the three-dimensional seasonal variations between IGS station positions and load models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this study reflects the uplift in Sichuan region through the overall change. Seasonal variations, load model errors and component shares of thermoelastic variability in horizontal and vertical deformations have been explained [31]. If a cleaner time series is desired, noise models need to be considered in addition to filtered CME [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study reflects the uplift in Sichuan region through the overall change. Seasonal variations, load model errors and component shares of thermoelastic variability in horizontal and vertical deformations have been explained [31]. If a cleaner time series is desired, noise models need to be considered in addition to filtered CME [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generated mainly by the varying environmental loading throughout the year, but can also be contributed by draconitic period, thermal expansion of ground and monuments, systematic errors or by spurious effects (e.g., Dong et al., 2002; Penna et al., 2007; Ray et al., 2008). On the short‐term temporal‐scale, periodic variations occur as the overtones of seasonal changes, but they are coupled with a plethora of effects due to tidal constituents unmodelled or mismodeled during the processing, GNSS‐specific signals, such as imperfect modeling of orbits, unexpected movement of the GNSS monument, errors in clocks, mismodeling of the large‐scale effects, changes in GNSS processing and errors in the assumptions or background models whose predictions are used during the processing; all these effects will show up in the time series of station displacement (Amiri‐Simkooei et al., 2017; Bos et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2006; Gruszczynski et al., 2018; Langbein & Svarc, 2019; Matviichuk et al., 2020; Niu et al., 2022; Ray et al., 2008; Saji et al., 2020; White et al., 2022; X. Xu et al., 2017; P. Xu et al., 2019). Superposition of the above effects means that the standard deviation of the series may change over the years, and the individual displacements may be correlated with each other.…”
Section: Quality Of Gps Displacementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not the best option in the context of Earth system monitoring based on GNSS data. Recent analyses have shown that GNSS station displacement time series provided by IGS have the smallest standard deviation, are spatially consistent, and have good correlation with environmental loading models, although contributions from individual analysis centers differ (Niu et al., 2022). The above makes the IGS solution considered the “gold standard.” Unfortunately, the number of GNSS stations processed by the IGS does not provide a sufficiently dense distribution of stations needed for local or regional analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niu et al. (2022) found that modeled SML displacements based on MGFs can only explain about 40% and 20% of GNSS‐derived annual deformation for vertical and horizontal components, respectively. Since GNSS technology, with its dense spatial resolution, can infer finely varied upper mantle and crust structure on a local/regional scale, which are commonly ignored so‐far in global SML modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niu et al (2022) considers that loading effects in the European region are complicated and loads deformation vectors are disorderly. Moreover, PREMCRU model gets abnormal worst correction at the European station MORP (1.686°W, 55.213°N) for North and Up components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%