2007
DOI: 10.1122/1.2516399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying dispersion of layered nanocomposites via melt rheology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
190
2
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
11
190
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2B and C allows us to estimate dB=1.4±0.2 and dN=1.6±0.2, similar to carbon-black composites(11), but somewhat smaller than values of ~2 found for nanoclay networks (15). In addition, the Krauss fits give structure factors close to m=0.5 which is typical for 5 filled elastomers ( Fig.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…2B and C allows us to estimate dB=1.4±0.2 and dN=1.6±0.2, similar to carbon-black composites(11), but somewhat smaller than values of ~2 found for nanoclay networks (15). In addition, the Krauss fits give structure factors close to m=0.5 which is typical for 5 filled elastomers ( Fig.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Naturally the orientation of silicate layers will determine the properties of various material functions. When studying the polypropylene-clay nanocomposites by rheological methods it was shown that the effect of flow can lead to break down of the aggregate network, and possibly, the aligning of the structural elements [30]. This resulted in time and shear history dependence of rheological properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in time and shear history dependence of rheological properties. Vermant et al [30], introduced a combination of transient flow protocols in order to separate the effects of flow on the aggregate structure and on the orientation of nanoclay domains. The degree of exfoliation was determined from the low frequency viscoelastic behavior and the high frequency behavior of dynamic moduli allowed estimation of the quality of dispersion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the dependencies in Figures 16.10 and 16.11 it is evident that randomization of orientation in diluted, exfoliated PA-6-based CPNC [Utracki, 2004] is about twice as fast as that of PP/PP-MA/C20A: 1 h versus > 2 h. The slower randomization in the latter system might originate in more massive intercalated stacks and/or higher matrix viscosity. In the case of intercalated nanocomposites with aggregates, the reversed and forward flows after preshearing might lead to different responses: for example, for PP with 17 wt% ethylene-propylene copolymer, 3.6 wt% PP-MA and 2.4 wt% C20A [Vermant et al, 2007]. After a short rest time, the stress overshoot obtained in forward flow was prominent, whereas no overshoot was seen in the reversed flow.…”
Section: Stress Overshoots In Shearmentioning
confidence: 99%