2010
DOI: 10.1080/02664760902814542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QuantifyingR2bias in the presence of measurement error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, R2 is biased downward because of the noise from mismeasurement. A simple derivation (see Majeske, Lynch-Caris, and Brelin-Fornari 2010) shows that in expectation,…”
Section: E Comparisons When the Benchmark Policy Is Imperfectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, R2 is biased downward because of the noise from mismeasurement. A simple derivation (see Majeske, Lynch-Caris, and Brelin-Fornari 2010) shows that in expectation,…”
Section: E Comparisons When the Benchmark Policy Is Imperfectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if property rights protection in the host-country dictates a firm's decision to invest there in the first place, it should also influence its choice to reinvest or repatriate foreign-earned income. And while typical treatments of the linear model tend to conclude that measurement error in the dependent variable is rather unproblematic (Greene 2008, 326), this conclusion does not hold where, as is the case here, the error is correlated with regressors (Wooldridge 2010, 76-82), or when the quantity of interest is the coefficient of determination (Majeske, Lynch-Caris, and Brelin-Fornari 2010). Therefore, it seems plausible that the weak results found above are due to measurement error.…”
Section: What Could Explain the Weak Explanatory Power Of The Countrymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…They also inflate the standard errors of the regression coefficients, resulting in an understatement of the significance of these coefficients (Wooldridge, , pp. 71–72; Majeske et al ., ). To see this, let us consider the following regression model where y is the variable that we would like to explain: y=β0+β1x1+β2x2++e…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Following Majeske et al . (), we subtract Equation ) from ), and we obtain the bias in ρ 2 due to measurement error in the dependent variable, denoted by D . D=ρy2ρy2…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation