2017
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1307460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying land use/land cover spatio-temporal landscape pattern dynamics from Hyperion using SVMs classifier and FRAGSTATS®

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It can help users to quantify the structure of landscapes. The landscape subject to analysis is user-defined and can represent any spatial phenomenon [35]. Based on the features of the study area, we emphasized on the quantity, shape features, aggregation, and diversity to analyze the spatial pattern of the green landscape [36].…”
Section: Landscape Pattern Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can help users to quantify the structure of landscapes. The landscape subject to analysis is user-defined and can represent any spatial phenomenon [35]. Based on the features of the study area, we emphasized on the quantity, shape features, aggregation, and diversity to analyze the spatial pattern of the green landscape [36].…”
Section: Landscape Pattern Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metrics used for the analysis are of a universal nature and are commonly used in landscape research (e.g. Lamine et al 2017;Marco da Silva et al 2015;Chefaoui 2014). Furthermore, they are easily interpretable, which is very important if the results are to be disseminated among a wide group of readers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM applies optimization algorithms to determine the location of ideal boundaries that can most effectively distinguish between classes (Lamine et al, 2018). An object-based SVM classification method was tested by Teo and Wu (2017) to categorize multispectral ALS data into five classes, achieving an overall accuracy of 96%.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%