Quantifying photovoltaic fire danger reduction with arc‐fault circuit interrupters

Abstract

Unmitigated arc-faults present fire dangers, shock hazards, and cause system downtime in photovoltaic (PV) systems. The 2011 National Electrical Code® added section 690.11 to require a listed arc-fault protection device on new PV systems. Underwriters Laboratories created the outline of investigation for PV DC arc-fault circuit protection, UL 1699B, for certifying arc-fault circuit interrupters (AFCIs) for arc suppression. Unfortunately, little is known about appropriate trip times for arc-faults generated at different locations in the PV system, with different electrode and polymer encapsulant geometries and materials. In this investigation, a plasma model was developed, which determines fire danger with UL 1699B-listed AFCIs and consequences of arc-fault discharges sustained beyond UL 1699B trip time requirements. This model predicts temperatures for varying system configurations and was validated by 100 and 300 W arc-faults experiments where combustion times and temperatures were measured. This investigation then extrapolated burn characteristics using this model to predict polymer ignition times for exposure to arc-power levels between 100 and 1200 W. The numerical results indicate AFCI maximum trip times required by UL 1699B are sufficient to suppress 100-1200 W arc-faults prior to fire initiation. Optical emission spectroscopy and thermochemical decomposition analysis were also conducted to assess spectral and chemical degradation of the polymer sheath. Published 2014. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Review of DC Series Arc Fault Testing Methods and Capability Assessment of Test Platforms for More-Electric Aircraft

“…3) Emulated Electrical System: As a middle ground between a simplified circuit and an actual real electrical system, the solution of an emulated system has been put forward. This can be in the form of a hardware emulator, such as the PV emulators used in [15], [79] (concept shown in Fig. 9), which are currently available as off the shelf equipment.…”

Experimental study on fire behaviors of flexible photovoltaic panels using a cone calorimeter

“…MLR peak and MLR mean represent the peak and mean MLRs, respectively. Subsequently, the slope of the fitted line allows determining the heat of gasification (L) using equation (9)…”

“…For that reason, the linear fit of mean MLR as functions of the heat flux can induce to wrong material gasification heat values. So, the peak MLR is chosen to calculate the gasification heat following equation (9), which is thus determined to be 3.1 kJ g 21 . With the same methods, the heat of gasification of PET + TPT is also calculated to be 3.1 kJ g 21 .…”

“…5,6 UL 1256 presents tests which evaluate fire characteristics of roof deck constructions subjected to an internal fire exposure. 7 In addition to these standards or guidelines, studies on PV fires have been extended by some researchers, [8][9][10][11][12] which mainly focused on reaction-tofire research of traditional PV modules. Yang et al 13 performed pioneer work in investigating fire behaviors of traditional hard lump PV modules.…”

Characterizing fire danger from low-power photovoltaic arc-faults

“…For all the polymers, the cathode heats up quickly[18] and the polymer sheath melts to the electrode, shown in (A), (C), and (E). In some cases, the polymer transitions to a liquid state and melts off the electrodes without catching fire; otherwise, the polymer visually combusts, e.g., (B), (D), and (F).…”