Quantifying political influence on COVID-19 fatality in Brazil

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic was severely aggravated in Brazil due to its politicization by the country’s federal government. However, the impact of diffuse political forces on the fatality of an epidemic is notoriously difficult to quantify. Here we introduce a method to measure this effect in the Brazilian case, based on the inhomogeneous distribution throughout the national territory of political support for the federal government. This political support is quantified by the voting rates in the last general election in Brazil. This data is correlated with the fatality rates by COVID-19 in each Brazilian state as the number of deaths grows over time. We show that the correlation between fatality rate and political support grows as the government’s misinformation campaign is developed. This led to the dominance of such political factor for the pandemic impact in Brazil in 2021. Once this dominance is established, this correlation allows for an estimation of the total number of deaths due to political influence as 350±70 thousand up to the end of 2021, corresponding to (57±11)% of the total number of deaths.

Measuring the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at a city level: An agent-based computational modelling study of the City of Natal

“…Moreover, the increase in infections would provide a demand for ICU units well above the available offer (Fig 6a .5). In a similar scenario, in which only the local federal university (UFRN)-which required a separate decree-would continue its activities regularly, we found a median increase of 44 deaths (40,44,54,56) compared to the baseline scenario.…”

“…For instance, we do not explicitly model the adherence levels to the government policies or whether they vary with the agent's attributes, such as sex, age, region, occupation, and stratum. There is evidence that adherence levels varied according to various circumstances, including political views [54]. But, also, there are significant indications of widespread commitment to the policies, as indicated by the overall reduction of mobility reported by local telecommunication companies [55] and the result of online inquiries [56].…”

The Challenges of Risk Aversion in Kidney Transplantation: Lessons From the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Brazil

“…However, the effectiveness of decision-making was hampered by prevailing uncertainties and the dissemination of misinformation. 12,13 Consequently, a series of regular virtual meetings organized by the Brazilian Organ Transplant Association served as a conduit for disseminating up-to-date information on the evolving phases of the pandemic. These meetings facilitated discussions on various topics, including developing pandemic-responsive strategies for screening both deceased and living donors and recipients, exploring treatment options, and refining posttransplant management approaches.…”

COVID-19 Patterns in Araraquara, Brazil: A Multimodal Analysis

“…Such strategies exposed, in particular, the somewhat unexpected size of the political bias regarding the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the mortality rate of COVID-19 in Brazil, surpassing other important epidemiological elements such as the level of poverty and the mutation of the virus. People were constantly persuaded not to adopt restrictive measures [ 25 , 26 ]. Furthermore, the fomentation of anti-COVID-19 measures by the federal government amplified the challenges of monitoring the spread of the virus, to the extent that the daily count of cases and deaths was not properly updated.…”