2015
DOI: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0628s70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Recording Quality in In Vivo Striatal Recordings

Abstract: The striatum mediates a variety of functions including movement, decision-making, motivation, and reward learning. In vivo recording is a powerful technique that allows for the interrogation of these striatal functions while an animal is awake and behaving. Here, we describe equipment needed and general setup for performing in vivo electrophysiology experiments, data processing, and quantification of recording quality. While this protocol is focused on striatal recordings, concepts should translate to other st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Single units were isolated by sorting spikes based on waveform shape in Spike2 and confirmed by both PCA and an interspike interval of Ͼ1 ms [average number of spikes per unit assignment ϭ 3,679.5 Ϯ 450.2; for all NCM units 0% of interstimulus intervals (ISIs) occurred in the 1-ms bin]. For each PCA we quantified the J3 statistic, which is expressed as a ratio of the variance within a PCA cluster to the variance between two identified clusters (see, e.g., Friend et al 2015). Our single units had J3 values ranging from 2.39 to 6.27 (mean Ϯ SE ϭ 4.08 Ϯ 0.64), reflecting excellent isolation in PC space (J3 values Ͼ 2 are considered to reflect well-isolated single units; Friend et al 2015;Pais-Vieira et al 2013;Wolff et al 2014).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Single units were isolated by sorting spikes based on waveform shape in Spike2 and confirmed by both PCA and an interspike interval of Ͼ1 ms [average number of spikes per unit assignment ϭ 3,679.5 Ϯ 450.2; for all NCM units 0% of interstimulus intervals (ISIs) occurred in the 1-ms bin]. For each PCA we quantified the J3 statistic, which is expressed as a ratio of the variance within a PCA cluster to the variance between two identified clusters (see, e.g., Friend et al 2015). Our single units had J3 values ranging from 2.39 to 6.27 (mean Ϯ SE ϭ 4.08 Ϯ 0.64), reflecting excellent isolation in PC space (J3 values Ͼ 2 are considered to reflect well-isolated single units; Friend et al 2015;Pais-Vieira et al 2013;Wolff et al 2014).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each PCA we quantified the J3 statistic, which is expressed as a ratio of the variance within a PCA cluster to the variance between two identified clusters (see, e.g., Friend et al 2015). Our single units had J3 values ranging from 2.39 to 6.27 (mean Ϯ SE ϭ 4.08 Ϯ 0.64), reflecting excellent isolation in PC space (J3 values Ͼ 2 are considered to reflect well-isolated single units; Friend et al 2015;Pais-Vieira et al 2013;Wolff et al 2014). Spike waveform quarter width durations (SQW; the duration of the waveform at 25% of the highest absolute peak value) and peak-to-peak durations were computed from the averaged waveforms.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Units were isolated based on waveform parameters including peak amplitude and principal components. Clusters containing similar valid waveforms were manually defined, and the single units did not contain a refractory period <1 ms. MANOVA test ( p < 0.05) was used to validate the single-unit nature of spikes (Friend et al, 2015 ). Neuroexplorer (Plexon) was used for further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We retained distinct units that did not substantially overlap other clusters in principle components space (Figure 2a); none of these units had an interspike interval violation within the 1 ms bin. All units used in the final analysis had a J3 statistic > 2 (mean ± SE = 3.74 ± 0.23), also indicating well‐isolated single units (Friend et al., 2015). We measured peak to peak duration (ms; depolarization peak to peak of after‐hyperpolarization) for each unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%