2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the economic contribution of wild food harvests to rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
3
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
76
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The study area, the Indian Ocean Coastal Belt (IOCB), is host to rich biodiversity [56] and dense human population, is undergoing rapid land cover change [57], and urban foraging is highly prevalent in this region (Sardeshpande and Shackleton unpublished data). We focus on the planting and foraging of wild edible fruit species, because they are (i) widely foraged globally [58], within South Africa [59], and in the study area (Sardeshpande and Shackleton unpublished data), (ii) commonly found in the wild as well as in human-dominated landscapes including agroforestry systems, home gardens, and urban green spaces [60], (iii) significant contributors to nutrition and income across the socioeconomic and rural-urban gradient [23], (iv) often resilient to climatic and harvesting pressures [61], and (v) potentially important to urban biodiversity, particularly frugivores and pollinators [62]. South Africa is among the most unequal economies in the world ( [63], p. 21), with a quarter of its population living below the food poverty line ( [63], p. 14).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study area, the Indian Ocean Coastal Belt (IOCB), is host to rich biodiversity [56] and dense human population, is undergoing rapid land cover change [57], and urban foraging is highly prevalent in this region (Sardeshpande and Shackleton unpublished data). We focus on the planting and foraging of wild edible fruit species, because they are (i) widely foraged globally [58], within South Africa [59], and in the study area (Sardeshpande and Shackleton unpublished data), (ii) commonly found in the wild as well as in human-dominated landscapes including agroforestry systems, home gardens, and urban green spaces [60], (iii) significant contributors to nutrition and income across the socioeconomic and rural-urban gradient [23], (iv) often resilient to climatic and harvesting pressures [61], and (v) potentially important to urban biodiversity, particularly frugivores and pollinators [62]. South Africa is among the most unequal economies in the world ( [63], p. 21), with a quarter of its population living below the food poverty line ( [63], p. 14).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these services, forest foods are collected by a large number of rural forest households in low-and middleincome countries. A study covering 24 countries indicates that over 55% of rural households with moderate-to-good access to forest resources collect forest food products (e.g., diverse species of animals, plants, and mushrooms) for subsistence (Hickey et al, 2016). For the top forest dependent communities across these countries, forest food products provide nearly 15% of the recommended quantities of fruits and vegetables, and 106% for meat and fish (Rowland et al, 2017).…”
Section: Underlying Determinants Of Undernutrition Addressed By Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of studies have indicated an important role non-timber forest products (NTFPs) play in supporting rural household income base . Furthermore, Hickey et al, (2016) noted the role of wild foods in supporting food security and nutrition. For example, it was noted that people living around forests have greater access to forest foods such as wild fruits, leafy greens and bush meat Powell et al, 2013Powell et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%