2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the effect of energetic disorder on organic solar cell energy loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This Gaussian width is represented by the fit parameter λ RO , which in principle represents the reorganization energy corresponding to the CT state to ground state transition, while in reality it also includes the energetic disorder, if not specifically accounted for. [ 32–35 ] In that case, the average E CT would be higher than E g A , but the higher energy CT‐states transfer to the acceptor and thus are not visible in EL spectroscopy. Second, the interface state and the acceptor exciton being isoenergetic, hybridize: [ 30,37–40 ] the interface (CT) state thus becomes a CT‐LE A hybrid state, with the local acceptor component LE A potentially becoming predominant as the CT state energy (without hybridization) increases and thus, the hybrid state emission becomes virtually similar to that of the acceptor's local excitonic state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Gaussian width is represented by the fit parameter λ RO , which in principle represents the reorganization energy corresponding to the CT state to ground state transition, while in reality it also includes the energetic disorder, if not specifically accounted for. [ 32–35 ] In that case, the average E CT would be higher than E g A , but the higher energy CT‐states transfer to the acceptor and thus are not visible in EL spectroscopy. Second, the interface state and the acceptor exciton being isoenergetic, hybridize: [ 30,37–40 ] the interface (CT) state thus becomes a CT‐LE A hybrid state, with the local acceptor component LE A potentially becoming predominant as the CT state energy (without hybridization) increases and thus, the hybrid state emission becomes virtually similar to that of the acceptor's local excitonic state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the energy level offset between the HOMO and LUMO determines the dissociation of photoexcited charges at the D–A interface. However, since the not very discreet energy levels 44 and the existence of energetic disorder, 45 it is difficult to predict the energetic landscape. To understand the charge transfer between the donor and acceptors, photoluminescence (PL) spectra were performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the EL emission of PTQ12:Y12 is completely dominated by Y12 S 1 emission, leading to a much lower ΔV oc,nrad of 0.21 V (Table S7 and Figure S16), in agreement with previous demonstrations of low nonradiative voltage losses when S 1 and CT-state emission is strongly mixed. 36,37 Such a low ΔV oc,nrad compares extremely favorably with other high-efficiency organic solar cells, using either chlorinated or nonchlorinated solvents, 38 and suggests that high-quality donor−acceptor interfaces with low CT-state energetic disorder 39,40 can be achieved using green solvents such as 2MeTHF. We note that achieving such a low ΔV oc,nrad is particularly promising given the unique combination of green solvent and synthetically simple polymer that we used here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%