2014
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/6/063069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the local density of optical states of nanorods by fluorescence lifetime imaging

Abstract: In this letter, we demonstrate a facile far-field approach to quantify the near-field local density of optical states (LDOS) of a nanorod using CdTe quantum dots (QDs) emitters tethered to the surface of nanorods as beacons for optical read-outs. Radiative decay rate was extracted to quantify the LDOS; our analysis indicates that the LDOS of the nanorod enhance both the radiative and nonradiative decay of QD, particularly radiative decay of QDs at the end of nanorod is enhanced by 1.17 times greater than that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the QD to waveguide surface distance is less than 10 nm, non-radiative decay into metallic losses is prominent. Hence, the outcoupling intensity at the end is decreased and our observation is consistent with previously reported values [ 10 , 18 ]. After 30 nm, the distance between QD and waveguide surface increases and the QD is positioned far from the evanescent surface plasmon mode tail.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…When the QD to waveguide surface distance is less than 10 nm, non-radiative decay into metallic losses is prominent. Hence, the outcoupling intensity at the end is decreased and our observation is consistent with previously reported values [ 10 , 18 ]. After 30 nm, the distance between QD and waveguide surface increases and the QD is positioned far from the evanescent surface plasmon mode tail.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…28 A Chameleon Ultra Ti-Sapphire tunable laser (Coherent Inc., California) operating in the range from 680 to 1080 nm was used as excitation. The laser beam was delivered onto the sample by a water-immersion objective (60× /1.20 NA, Olympus).…”
Section: Second-harmonic Imaging Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that the photon-induced carrier density on the graphene sheet dominates this energy transfer process. To prove this, we calculated the enhancement factors (γ R and γ NR ) of radiative decay rate (Γ R ) and nonradiative decay rate (Γ NR ) of individual NV centers, [57][58][59] as shown in Figure 5A,B. The graphene has relatively less influence on the radiative decay of affiliated NV centers, while it has a significant impact on the nonradiative decay behavior of NV centers in these nanodiamonds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The arriving time of photons from NV center formed a TCSPC histogram, which was then fitted with a multiexponential decay function to obtain fluorescence lifetime. [58,59] For G2 measurements, a Hanbury Brown-Twiss (HBT) geometry was used to investigate the single photon emission property of nanodiamonds. In the HBT setup, photon current from one SPAD (SPAD1) was used as "Sync" and the photon current from the other SPAD (SPAD2) was connected to "start"; the second order correlation function G 2 (τ) = 〈I(t)I(t + τ)〉 /〈I(t)〉 2 was calculated via the correlation card "TimeHarp 200.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%