DOI: 10.22215/etd/2016-11560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Pressure, Temperature, and Timing of Metamorphism in the Montresor Belt, Nunavut, Canada

Abstract: P-T-t conditions are determined for the Montresor belt (Rae Province, Nunavut) using modern thermodynamic modeling and in-situ U-Th-Pb monazite geochronology. Phase equilibrium modeling yields peak P-T estimates of 355 -455°C and <4200 bar for the upper Montresor belt and 500 -580°C and <4000 bar for the lower Montresor belt, with a high geothermal gradient of ca. 57°C/km during metamorphism. Forward modeling of garnet crystallization suggests growth along a clockwise, nearly isobaric P-T path from ca. 539 -54… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(227 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the boundary between the footwall complex and overlying upper Montresor units near the southwestern end of the belt, the footwall complex consists of muscovite-andalusitesillimanite-garnet schist indicating middle-amphibolite facies conditions (3.3 kbar, 575 o C) at 1861-1844 Ma (Berman et al 2015a;Dziawa 2016). The schistosity dips moderately northwest and is concordant with well-preserved bedding in the structurally overlying, weakly deformed sandstone, siltstone and minor carbonate units of the upper Montresor group.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the boundary between the footwall complex and overlying upper Montresor units near the southwestern end of the belt, the footwall complex consists of muscovite-andalusitesillimanite-garnet schist indicating middle-amphibolite facies conditions (3.3 kbar, 575 o C) at 1861-1844 Ma (Berman et al 2015a;Dziawa 2016). The schistosity dips moderately northwest and is concordant with well-preserved bedding in the structurally overlying, weakly deformed sandstone, siltstone and minor carbonate units of the upper Montresor group.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small outlier of kaolinitic sandstone adjacent to the Amer belt was assigned an assemblage 4 designation and correlated with upper Montresor strata 110-180 km to the northeast (op cit.). However, in the Montresor belt proper, structural reconstruction indicates that the upper Montresor rocks were deformed by D 1 thrusts and a D 2 extensional detachment prior to development of the upright Montresor syncline (Tschirhart and Percival, 2016; Percival and Tschirhart, submitted).The D 2 low-angle, extensional fault is responsible for juxtaposing the greenschist-facies upper Montresor rocks with the amphibolite-facies lower Montresor units in the structural footwall complex(Percival et al 2015b;Dziawa 2016). Combined, the geochronological, structural and metamorphic observations support assignment of upper Taken together, the age constraints for the Montresor group suggest a minimum gap of ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%