2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the transmission potential of pandemic influenza

Abstract: This article reviews quantitative methods to estimate the basic reproduction number of pandemic influenza, a key threshold quantity to help determine the intensity of interventions required to control the disease. Although it is difficult to assess the transmission potential of a probable future pandemic, historical epidemiologic data is readily available from previous pandemics, and as a reference quantity for future pandemic planning, mathematical and statistical analyses of historical data are crucial. In p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
(203 reference statements)
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By looking at past pandemics, we can only make assumptions on its transmissibility potential, which can be summarized by the reproductive number R 0 (essentially, the number of secondary infections that results from a single infectious individual in a fully susceptible population (Anderson & May 1992)). Therefore, according to the recent estimates of the reproductive number for recent influenza pandemics (Mills et al 2004;Ferguson et al 2005;Chowell & Nishiura 2008), plausible transmissibility scenarios on R 0 are drawn: the investigated values range from 1.6 to 2.4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By looking at past pandemics, we can only make assumptions on its transmissibility potential, which can be summarized by the reproductive number R 0 (essentially, the number of secondary infections that results from a single infectious individual in a fully susceptible population (Anderson & May 1992)). Therefore, according to the recent estimates of the reproductive number for recent influenza pandemics (Mills et al 2004;Ferguson et al 2005;Chowell & Nishiura 2008), plausible transmissibility scenarios on R 0 are drawn: the investigated values range from 1.6 to 2.4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been developed for estimating the effective reproduction number from daily incidence data, which are reviewed in Chowell and Nishiura 6. These range from methods based on the exponential growth rate of incidence in the early stages of a disease 7–9 (to cite but a few of the many), fitting a SIR (Susceptible, Infective, Recovered) ordinary differential equation model curve 10, likelihood‐based estimation methods 11–13 and stochastic SIR models with Bayesian estimation 10, 14–16.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling the initial phase of epidemics G. Katriel et al 859 distribution and stochasticity, it offers a very attractive and more direct alternative to the widely applied approach for estimating R e based on estimating the exponential growth rate r of the epidemic curve and relating r to R e using the generation-interval distribution [16].…”
Section: Estimating the Effective Reproductive Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%