1979
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-197906000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
341
3
10

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,040 publications
(358 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
341
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, a substantial number of cases were defined as "benign" only because the tumor did not become enlarged during the follow-up period or because the FNAB finding was negative just once. In this study we evaluated whether repeating FDGresolution of the PET scanner, known as the partial volume effect [21]. Consequently, it remains controversial whether SUVmax is useful to distinguish between benign and malignant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a substantial number of cases were defined as "benign" only because the tumor did not become enlarged during the follow-up period or because the FNAB finding was negative just once. In this study we evaluated whether repeating FDGresolution of the PET scanner, known as the partial volume effect [21]. Consequently, it remains controversial whether SUVmax is useful to distinguish between benign and malignant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVC methods can be grouped into two main categories: post-reconstruction and duringreconstruction methods. Post-reconstruction methods include the region-based methods, such as the recovery-coefficient correction [168] and the geometric transfer-matrix (GTM) method [169]. Other post-reconstruction corrections consist of voxel-based methods, such as the popular Mueller-Gaertner method (MGM) [170], image deconvolution [171], and the "region-based voxel-wise correction" (RBV) [172].…”
Section: Partial Volume Correction In Pet and Spectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVE leads to an underestimation of the activity concentration in the PET images and spillover into surrounding tissues that is observed in objects smaller than three times the spatial resolution. In addition, image sampling where different types of tissue and thus radiotracer concentrations are included in one voxel also contributes to PVE [42][43][44]. There are several methods for partial volume correction based either on the count recovery models such as the recovery coefficient [45,46] or the contrast recovery coefficient method [47][48][49] or they are based on anatomical data (derived from MR imaging) such as the geometric transfer matrix method [50].…”
Section: Partial Volume Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%