1984
DOI: 10.1159/000466276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation of Antibody Binding to Erythrocytes in LISS

Abstract: The amount of antibody bound to cells in a low ionic strength solution (LISS) has been quantitated for several antibodies including anti-D, anti-c, anti-Kell, anti-Fy^a, and anti-Jk^a. With the exception of the Kell antibodies there was an enhancement of the rate of antibody uptake in LISS. For Rh antibodies the amount bound after a 5-min LISS incubation is comparable to that bound after 45 min in saline. For Kell antibodies a smaller amount was bound in LISS than in saline. The effect of the ratio of serum to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, antibodies that are generally unreactive (undetectable) at low concentrations may be detectable with LISS. The amount of antibody bound per cell is also affected by the serum‐to‐packed‐cell ratio 7 . A 50‐percent increase in antibody bound can be obtained by increasing the ratio from 20:1 to 40:1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, antibodies that are generally unreactive (undetectable) at low concentrations may be detectable with LISS. The amount of antibody bound per cell is also affected by the serum‐to‐packed‐cell ratio 7 . A 50‐percent increase in antibody bound can be obtained by increasing the ratio from 20:1 to 40:1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method 1 is based on our original method, Methods 2 and 3 are “in‐house” modifications to that method, and Methods 4 and 5 are based on those of Christensson et al 5 and Hilden et al, 6 respectively. The modifications included in Methods 2 and 3 were a 20‐minute sensitization based on the low‐ionic‐strength saline solution (LISS) method described by Merry et al 7 and the use of LISS throughout as a wash buffer to help minimize the loss of low‐affinity antibodies. The inclusion of normal‐ionic‐strength saline solution/bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the serum diluent in Method 3 was based on our experience in quantifying serum levels of monoclonal anti‐D by flow cytometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%