Quantitative analysis in a heuristic evaluation experiment

González, Marta; Masip, Llúcia; Saltiveri, Toni Granollers i; Oliva, Marta

doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.027

Cited by 36 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are initial approaches to evaluate the UX with the help of heuristics [4], [5], [7], [10]- [13]. Two publications [10], [12] deal with special heuristics for the evaluation of the UX.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Heuristics Considering UX and Quality Criteria for Heuristics

Bader¹,

Schön²,

Thomaschewski³

2017

IJIMAI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New heuristics are often further developments of established heuristics and emerge, for example, by making an adjustment to another context being examined, such as mobile end devices [7] AbstractHeuristic evaluation is a cheap tool with which one can take qualitative measures of a product's usability. However, since the methodology was first presented, the User Experience (UX) has become more popular but the heuristics have remained the same. In this paper, we analyse the current state of heuristic evaluation in terms of heuristics for measuring the UX. To do so, we carried out a literature review. In addition, we had a look at different heuristics and mapped them with the UX dimensions of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Moreover, we proposed a quality model for heuristic evaluation and a list of quality criteria for heuristics.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In literature, there are some articles that deal with heuristic evaluation and recommend the use of heuristics [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In the analysis of the related work, it is striking that current heuristics are almost completely focussed on the evaluation of usability.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Heuristics Considering UX and Quality Criteria for Heuristics

Bader¹,

Schön²,

Thomaschewski³

2017

IJIMAI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A detailed description of each heuristic and subheuristics can be found in [45]. Apart from that, to determine the severity level, two parameters were used: Impact and Frequency.…”

Section: Followed Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building a Usable and Accessible Semantic Web Interaction Platform

et al. 2009

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Semantic Web applications take off is being slower than expected, at least with respect to "real-world" applications and users. One of the main reasons for this lack of adoption is that most Semantic Web user interfaces are still immature from the usability and accessibility points of view. This is due to the novelty of these technologies, but this also motivates the exploration of alternative interaction paradigms, different from the "traditional" Web or Desktop applications ones. Our proposal is realized in the Rhizomer platform, which explores the possibilities of the object-action interaction paradigm at the Web scale. This paradigm is well suited for heterogeneous resource spaces such as those common in the Semantic Web.Resources, described by metadata, correspond to the objects in the paradigm.Semantic web services, which are dynamically associated to these objects, correspond to the actions. The platform is being put into practice in the context of a research project in order to build an open application for media distribution based on Semantic Web technologies. Moreover, its usability and accessibility have been evaluated in this real setting and compared to similar systems.

show abstract

“…The heuristic evaluation method is a technique for evaluating the usability, with the inspection being carried out mainly by evaluators from principles established by the discipline [6]. In most applications the results tend to be qualitative, however, these qualitative results do not allow us to determine how usable it is or how it becomes an interactive system.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In most applications the results tend to be qualitative, however, these qualitative results do not allow us to determine how usable it is or how it becomes an interactive system. Hence, the need for quantitative results may also be very necessary in order to determine the effort that would be needed to get a sufficiently usable system [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%