2021
DOI: 10.1017/9781108151726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis of Geopressure for Geoscientists and Engineers

Abstract: Geopressure, or excess pore pressure in subsurface rock formations that is higher than the hydrostatic pressure, is a worldwide phenomenon which impacts hydrocarbon resource estimation, drilling and drilling safety in operations. This book provides a comprehensive overview of geopressure analysis bringing together rock physics, seismic technology, quantitative basin modeling and geomechanics. It provides a fundamental physical and geological basis for understanding geopressure by explaining the coupled mechani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 432 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective pressure cube (also known as differential pressure) governs the compaction process in sedimentary rocks. Geopressuring implies that the rock has low effective stress and a higher porosity than would be expected when the rock was normally compacted; it results in a lower rock velocity (Dutta et al 2021). Pressure test data of the studied field generally start from Sarvak and continue to Gotnia Formation, but data in the upper formations are minimal (Fig.…”
Section: Effective Pressure Cubementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The effective pressure cube (also known as differential pressure) governs the compaction process in sedimentary rocks. Geopressuring implies that the rock has low effective stress and a higher porosity than would be expected when the rock was normally compacted; it results in a lower rock velocity (Dutta et al 2021). Pressure test data of the studied field generally start from Sarvak and continue to Gotnia Formation, but data in the upper formations are minimal (Fig.…”
Section: Effective Pressure Cubementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Direct P p measurement tests such as RFTs and MDTs are the most reliable measurements (Gunter & Moore, 1986; Zoback, 2007). However, these direct Pp measurements are difficult to acquire, particularly in low permeability formations, and are often only conducted at depths where possible overpressures may exist (Dutta et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2022; Y. Z. Ma & Holditch, 2015; Zoback, 2007).…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%