2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1493229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of the polarization fields and absorption changes in InGaN/GaN quantum wells with electroabsorption spectroscopy

Abstract: Electroabsorption measurements are reported for wurtzite InGaN/GaN quantum wells. The electroabsorption technique allows exact quantitative analysis of absorption and absorption changes in InGaN quantum wells and barrier layers, with recorded field-induced absorption changes as large as 7000 cm Ϫ1 below and almost 20000 cm Ϫ1 above the band edge. The technique thus allows precise determination of the strong internal fields that originate from strain-induced polarization and differences in spontaneous polarizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
42
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, experimental investigations indicate weaker polarization than predicted, ranging from 20% (Chichibu et al 1998) to 80% (Renner et al 2002) of the theoretical value, with typical results near 50% (Zhang et al 2004). This broad variation was attributed to partial compensation of the builtin polarization by fixed defect and interface charges (Ibbetson et al 2000) or to inappropriate analysis of measured data (Brown et al 2005).…”
Section: Model and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, experimental investigations indicate weaker polarization than predicted, ranging from 20% (Chichibu et al 1998) to 80% (Renner et al 2002) of the theoretical value, with typical results near 50% (Zhang et al 2004). This broad variation was attributed to partial compensation of the builtin polarization by fixed defect and interface charges (Ibbetson et al 2000) or to inappropriate analysis of measured data (Brown et al 2005).…”
Section: Model and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Within the quantum wells, the polarization field separates electrons and holes, thereby reducing stimulated and spontaneous emission. However, experimental investigations of InGaN quantum wells often result in weaker built-in fields than predicted, ranging from 20% [33] to 80% [34] of the theoretical value, with typical results near 50% [35]. This broad variation has been attributed to partial compensation of the polarization field by fixed defect and interface charges [36] or to inappropriate analysis of measured data [37].…”
Section: Built-in Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Experimental investigations of similar quantum wells often give weaker built-in fields than predicted, ranging from 20% [11] to 80% [12] of the theoretical value, with typical results near 50% [13]. This broad variation has been attributed to partial compensation of the built-in polarization by fixed defect and interface charges [14] or to inappropriate analysis of measured data [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%