1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf01526184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of voice quality in early glottic laryngeal carcinomas treated with radiotherapy

Abstract: The quality of voice after radiotherapy is generally considered to be better than that after surgery for early glottic (T1a and T1b) carcinomas. Studies concerning voice quality after radiotherapy are scarce, and results have been contradictory concerning actual normalization of voice following therapy. This study was designed to compare several voice parameters of patients successfully treated 1-12 years previously with radiotherapy (5750-7000 cGy) for early glottic carcinoma. Parameters involved an age- and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vocal function following radiotherapy, evaluated by means of videolaryngostroboscopy, appeared to be normal in 60% to 86% of the patients, whereas perceptual analysis revealed that 55% of these patients had normal voice quality. These findings are within in the wide range of results in the literature, varying from voice improvement to a normal or near‐normal level for at least 70% of the patients 10–17 to abnormal postradiation voices for the majority of cases 2–9 . In our study, voice quality following radiotherapy was influenced mainly by age of the speaker and stripping rather than performing biopsy of the vocal cords for initial diagnosis, while stroboscopic analyses of vocal function revealed that next to increasing age and stripping the vocal cord, continued smoking after treatment decreased vocal function following radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vocal function following radiotherapy, evaluated by means of videolaryngostroboscopy, appeared to be normal in 60% to 86% of the patients, whereas perceptual analysis revealed that 55% of these patients had normal voice quality. These findings are within in the wide range of results in the literature, varying from voice improvement to a normal or near‐normal level for at least 70% of the patients 10–17 to abnormal postradiation voices for the majority of cases 2–9 . In our study, voice quality following radiotherapy was influenced mainly by age of the speaker and stripping rather than performing biopsy of the vocal cords for initial diagnosis, while stroboscopic analyses of vocal function revealed that next to increasing age and stripping the vocal cord, continued smoking after treatment decreased vocal function following radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In the literature on voice characteristics following radiotherapy, a variety of voice parameters is used. It seems that different results to some extent can be attributed to this variety: some studies report abnormal postradiation voices, 2–9 whereas others report voice improvement to a normal or near‐normal level for at least 70% of the patients 10–17 . In earlier research, we described detailed investigations concerning voice quality following radiotherapy for early glottic cancer by means of perceptual and acoustical analyses 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies, however, question this statement [7]. Dagli et al [5] also demonstrated that voice could not be considered normal after radiotherapy in early-stage glottic tumors. Remacle et al [26] and Zeitels [36] have published excellent phonetic results after surgical therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hocevar-Boltezar et al (2000) 41 and Dagli et al (1997) 42 also found increased jitter and shimmer values and a higher fundamental frequency compared to controls in irradiated patients assessed objectively. Such results may be explained by post-radiation vocal fold fibrosis and rigidity in both sides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%