2006
DOI: 10.1021/jf0532258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative and Confirmatory Analyses of Malachite Green and Leucomalachite Green Residues in Fish and Shrimp

Abstract: Liquid chromatographic methods are presented for the quantitative and confirmatory determination of malachite green (MG) and leucomalachite green (LMG) in catfish, trout, tilapia, basa, salmon, and shrimp. Residues were extracted from tissues with ammonium acetate buffer and acetonitrile, and isolated by partitioning into dichloromethane. Leucomalachite green was quantitatively oxidized to the chromic malachite green by reaction with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone. Samples were cleaned-up by solid p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This method included the most common and effective therapeutic dyes used in aquaculture (MG, CV, BG, and MB) and expanded the list to include other dyes that might be substituted for these to avoid regulatory detection, including pararosaniline, ethyl violet, the trinaphthylmethyl Victoria blue dyes, azure B, and new MB. Similar to other procedures, 145 the dyes were extracted from salmon using ammonium acetate buffer at pH 4.5, acetonitrile, and alumina followed by liquid-liquid extraction with dichloromethane, oxidation with DDQ, and cation exchange SPE. Because leuco metabolites are only available for MG and CV, the inclusion of a DDQ oxidation process drives leuco metabolites of triarylmethane and phenothiazine dyes to their chromic parent dye for simplified analysis.…”
Section: Multi-class Dye Residue Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method included the most common and effective therapeutic dyes used in aquaculture (MG, CV, BG, and MB) and expanded the list to include other dyes that might be substituted for these to avoid regulatory detection, including pararosaniline, ethyl violet, the trinaphthylmethyl Victoria blue dyes, azure B, and new MB. Similar to other procedures, 145 the dyes were extracted from salmon using ammonium acetate buffer at pH 4.5, acetonitrile, and alumina followed by liquid-liquid extraction with dichloromethane, oxidation with DDQ, and cation exchange SPE. Because leuco metabolites are only available for MG and CV, the inclusion of a DDQ oxidation process drives leuco metabolites of triarylmethane and phenothiazine dyes to their chromic parent dye for simplified analysis.…”
Section: Multi-class Dye Residue Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…144 This permitted sensitive analysis of the sum of MG and LMG in a variety of seafood products with HPLC-VIS and quantification and confirmation of residue identity by LC-MS n with no-discharge atmospheric pressure ionization at and below concentrations of 1 μg/kg for complete regulatory monitoring. 145,146 The method was later extended to include CV, LCV, and BG residues 30 and adapted for other analytical procedures including LC-MS/MS analysis. 147 Though extract clean-up procedures for triphenylmethane compounds often include similar procedures based on acid/organic solvent extraction with partitioning into dichloromethane and cation exchange SPE cartridge clean-up, many variations exist.…”
Section: Procedures To Extract and Analyze Triphenylmethane Dye Residmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of groups have developed alternative methods for isolating TPM residues using McIlvaine buffer and ACN prior to purification on aromatic sulphonic acid [413], SAX [418] or alumina-MCX SPE sorbents [415,419]. Other groups have used an alternative ammonium acetate and ACN extraction solvent prior to PRS [409,420] or alumina-SCX [410] clean-ups.…”
Section: Andersen Et Al Developed a Methods Capable Of Isolating Mg mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been used to control fungal and protozoan infections in fish. [17,18] Although the use of MG has now been prohibited for the control of fungal infections in commercial fisheries, it is still used worldwide because it is readily accessible and economical. [19] As a result, there is a strong demand for the substitutes for MG compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%