2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Assessment of Severity of Mitral Regurgitation by Serial Echocardiography in a Multicenter Clinical Trial of Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MR at baseline was graded according to American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. 16) After the procedure, MR grade was assessed by the technique reported by Foster, et al 17) Main exclusion criteria were severe clinical comorbidities, such as end-stage cancer or other severe diseases with a very unfavorable prognosis. Patients were excluded if the morphology of the mitral valve made percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair technically impossible or unlikely beyond the classical EVEREST criteria (ie, short or calcified posterior leaflet without the possibility of leaflet grasping or the beginnings of mitral stenosis).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR at baseline was graded according to American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. 16) After the procedure, MR grade was assessed by the technique reported by Foster, et al 17) Main exclusion criteria were severe clinical comorbidities, such as end-stage cancer or other severe diseases with a very unfavorable prognosis. Patients were excluded if the morphology of the mitral valve made percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair technically impossible or unlikely beyond the classical EVEREST criteria (ie, short or calcified posterior leaflet without the possibility of leaflet grasping or the beginnings of mitral stenosis).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Despite the use of expert core laboratory facilities and a standardized guidelinesbased approach, 18,29 MR quantification can be challenging after MitraClip placement. It is possible that the small decrease in LV volumes seen even in patients with residual 3 to 4+ MR reflects a small decrease in regurgitant volume that is sufficient to reduce LV volumes without changing MR grade to 2+ or better.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of MR grading pre-and post-MitraClip have been previously reported. 18 LV volumes and ejection fraction were measured using the biplane method of disks. LA volumes were measured by biplane method.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In particular, severity of MR was assessed according to the technique previously described by Foster et al 7 Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were scheduled at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year thereafter.…”
Section: Medication and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%