2004
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QuantitativeRARβ2Hypermethylation

Abstract: Retinoic acid receptor ␤2 (RAR␤2) is a tumor suppressor gene frequently hypermethylated in several human neoplasms. To further characterize this epigenetic alteration in prostate cancer progression, we examined tumor tissue from 118 patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa), 38 paired highgrade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias (HGPIN), and nonneoplastic prostate tissue from 30 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. We found RAR␤2 hypermethylation in 97.5%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
76
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike detection of prostate cancer DNA using tests for methylation marks, DNA methylation biomarkers for prostate cancer prognosis are still limited. Methylation marks for EDNRB, RARb, RASSF1a, ERb, and TIG1 may be suitable for this unmet need as each has been correlated with known prognostic factors for primary prostate cancer, such as tumor stage and/or Gleason grade (22)(23)(24)(25)59). Indeed in 1 study, PTGS2 methylation marks in the localized prostate cancer predicted prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy, independently of tumor stage and Gleason grade (60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, unlike detection of prostate cancer DNA using tests for methylation marks, DNA methylation biomarkers for prostate cancer prognosis are still limited. Methylation marks for EDNRB, RARb, RASSF1a, ERb, and TIG1 may be suitable for this unmet need as each has been correlated with known prognostic factors for primary prostate cancer, such as tumor stage and/or Gleason grade (22)(23)(24)(25)59). Indeed in 1 study, PTGS2 methylation marks in the localized prostate cancer predicted prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy, independently of tumor stage and Gleason grade (60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably hypermethylation of the glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene occurs in approximately 90% of all prostate cancers and is an early event, with DNA methylation lesions common in prostate intraepithelial neoplasia, making this gene a useful marker for early prostate cancer detection (17,18). In addition to GSTP1, more than 40 genes have been reported to be targets of epigenetic gene silencing in prostate cancers (19) including adenomatosis polyposis coli (APC), Ras association domain family 1A (RASSF1A), prostaglandinendoperoxidase synthase 2 (PTGS2), multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR1), retinoic acid receptor beta 2 (RARb2), tazarotene-induced gene-1 (TIG1), and oestrogen receptor-beta (ER-b), which have also been shown to be involved in tumor initiation and progression and have been correlated with clinicopathologic parameters (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). A number of groups have also attempted to use combinations of genes to develop improved methylation-based tests for disease progression (26)(27)(28); however, no current epigenetic biomarker can predict disease aggressiveness or survival better than Gleason grade and serum PSA tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the prostate carcinogenesis, epigenetic changes are so frequent that they allow the discrimination between the normal and neoplastic tissues with a specificity of up to 100% [29,30], some histone modifications are associated with the increased risk of low-grade prostate cancer recurrence [20]. However, the relationship between global histone modification and the prostate cancer progression remains elusive [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, clinicians have been become interested in novel direct or indirect diagnostic methods to overcome such problems. Thus, several molecular, biological and serological studies have been undertaken (Jeromino et al, 2004;Beer et al, 2008;Mengus et al, 2011).…”
Section: Subtypes Of White Blood Cells In Patients With Prostate Cancmentioning
confidence: 99%