2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5025432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative comparison of closed-loop and dual harmonic Kelvin probe force microscopy techniques

Abstract: Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) is a widely used technique to map surface potentials at the nanometer scale. In traditional KPFM, a feedback loop regulates the DC bias applied between a sharp conductive probe and a sample to nullify the electrostatic force (closed-loop operation). In comparison, open-loop techniques such as dual harmonic KPFM (DH-KPFM) are simpler to implement, are less sensitive to artefacts, offer the unique ability to probe voltage sensitive materials, and operate in liquid environment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional KPFM is a closed-loop technique in which a bias feedback loop is used to control the DC bias until it fully compensates, or minimizes, the electrostatic force between the tip and sample. Closed-loop operation imposes some limitations on the KPFM measurement, such as the requirement for feedback loop tuning, feedback errors, and possible bandwidth limitations . Together, these motivated the development of open-loop or feedback-free KPFM methods that eliminate the need for a DC nulling bias .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional KPFM is a closed-loop technique in which a bias feedback loop is used to control the DC bias until it fully compensates, or minimizes, the electrostatic force between the tip and sample. Closed-loop operation imposes some limitations on the KPFM measurement, such as the requirement for feedback loop tuning, feedback errors, and possible bandwidth limitations . Together, these motivated the development of open-loop or feedback-free KPFM methods that eliminate the need for a DC nulling bias .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closed-loop operation imposes some limitations on the KPFM measurement, such as the requirement for feedback loop tuning, 18 feedback errors, 19−23 and possible bandwidth limitations. 24 methods that eliminate the need for a DC nulling bias. 25 Dual harmonic KPFM (DH-KPFM) is one example of open-loop KPFM, which has been utilized to measure the surface potential in ultrahigh vacuum, 25 air, 22,26 and liquid environments.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the DH-KPFM measurement, an AC bias was applied between the tip and the sample to excite the cantilever vibration at its resonant frequency. The amplitudes of the cantilever at resonant frequency (ω) as well as twice the resonant frequency (2ω) and the phase of vibration were all recorded, and the surface potential was further calculated according to previous studies . In the DH-KPFM scanning, the scan size was 20 μm, and the lift height was set to 100 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) was proven to be a powerful tool for measuring the charge density on a solid surface in air conditions. But unfortunately, it cannot be used in a liquid environment directly, especially in polar liquids and conductive liquids, since that direct (DC) voltage bias needs to be applied to compensate for the potential difference between the tip and the sample, which may lead to the electric double-layer (EDL) charging, migration of the ions in liquid, and even decomposition of the liquid molecules. To overcome this problem, recently dual-harmonic Kelvin probe force microscopy (DH-KPFM) was designed to measure the surface potential of the solid in a liquid environment. , As with the conventional KPFM, the vibration of the cantilever is also excited by the alternating (AC) voltage bias applied between the tip and the sample in DH-KPFM. But the difference is that the amplitudes of the cantilever at the resonant frequency (ω) and twice the resonant frequency (2ω) are both recorded for further calculating the surface potential of the solid, and the DC bias is not required in DH-KPFM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They incorporate a direct measurement of either the amplitude or frequency response of the AFM probe to an applied single-frequency bias modulation. Furthermore, multi-frequency operations of OL KPFM were introduced as band-excitation OL BE-KPFM [37][38][39], intermodulation electrostatic force microscopy [40], and dual-harmonic KPFM (DH-KPFM) [34,41,42]. In DH-KPFM, the CPD is obtained from the ratio of the amplitudes of the first two harmonics of the cantilever response to an AC bias modulation and requires a prior calibration for the gain of the cantilever's transfer function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%