2000
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2071:qcvosb>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Cross Validation of Space-Based and Ground-Based Radar Observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low-level reflectivity measurements are also subject to attenuation due to the operating wavelength of the PR. Comparisons with non-attenuated ground radar observations suggest that the PR 2A25 algorithm does well at correcting for attenuation at altitudes near 2 km (Bolen and Chandrasekar 2000;Schumacher and Houze 2000). As in Schumacher and Houze (2003a), binned orbital 2 km reflectivity is converted to rain rate using the TRMM version 5 convective and stratiform near-surface initial reflectivity-rain rate (Z-R) relations (Z = 148 R 1.55 and Z = 276 R 1.49 , respectively).…”
Section: Tropics-wide Statistics Of Reflectivity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-level reflectivity measurements are also subject to attenuation due to the operating wavelength of the PR. Comparisons with non-attenuated ground radar observations suggest that the PR 2A25 algorithm does well at correcting for attenuation at altitudes near 2 km (Bolen and Chandrasekar 2000;Schumacher and Houze 2000). As in Schumacher and Houze (2003a), binned orbital 2 km reflectivity is converted to rain rate using the TRMM version 5 convective and stratiform near-surface initial reflectivity-rain rate (Z-R) relations (Z = 148 R 1.55 and Z = 276 R 1.49 , respectively).…”
Section: Tropics-wide Statistics Of Reflectivity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During and subsequent to the project, several independent estimates of the S-band radar reflectivity calibration offset were made utilizing engineering measurements of the radar hardware (G. Mueller 2000, personal communication), comparison with version-4 TRMM PR data (Bolen and Chandrasekar 2000), and comparison with rain gauge data (C. Schumacher 2000, personal communication). The consensus calibration correction with uncertainty from these estimates is 5 dB Ϯ 2 dB (details may be found online at www.atmos.…”
Section: S-band and C-band Radar Scan Strategies And Calibration For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the attenuation correction, accurate radar calibration is the key to ensure reliable estimates of hydrometeor parameters. Although a variety of approaches can be used to address this issue, such as the internal calibration from which satellite instrument data have been used to assess the stability of the transmitter and receiver (Kawanishi et al 2000), the most important type of external calibration is perhaps the comparisons of the PR-derived radar reflectivities with the estimates of the same quantities made with well-calibrated ground-based radars (Anagnostou et al 2001;Schumacher and Houze 2000;Bolen and Chandrasekar 2000;Liao et al 2001). Near the top of stratiform storms where dry snow is almost exclusively present, the TRMM PR returns are nearly attenuation free.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%