2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-1699-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative determination of magnetite and maghemite in iron oxide nanoparticles using Mössbauer spectroscopy

Abstract: Iron oxide nanoparticles are available in two common phases, namely magnetite (Fe 3 O 4) and maghemite (Fe 2 O 3). Upon exposure to oxygen atoms, the magnetite phase readily oxidizes into the maghemite phase with the partial conversion of ferrous ions into ferric ions. We report on the approach to determine the ratio of magnetite and maghemite in iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized by the wet chemical route. X-ray diffraction studies and transmission electron microscopy observations confirmed the formation of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When analyzing this type of nanoparticles, it can be seen that the low-frequency electron transport did not occur from the surface of one nanoparticle to the surface of the second one, but through the disordered γ-Fe 2 O 3 layer. Accordingly, the accumulation of charge carriers occurred on highly defected, more resistive γ-Fe 2 O 3 surfaces containing many different defects such as iron vacancies and dislocations [ 4 , 14 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When analyzing this type of nanoparticles, it can be seen that the low-frequency electron transport did not occur from the surface of one nanoparticle to the surface of the second one, but through the disordered γ-Fe 2 O 3 layer. Accordingly, the accumulation of charge carriers occurred on highly defected, more resistive γ-Fe 2 O 3 surfaces containing many different defects such as iron vacancies and dislocations [ 4 , 14 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that the transport of electrons in magnetite is much easier than in maghemite and is related to the electrons hopping between Fe 3+ and Fe 2+ ions [ 41 ]. When the magnetite surface is blocked by other non-magnetic nanoparticles, high disordering, or γ-Fe 2 O 3 , in which only Fe 3+ and iron vacancies exist, the electron movement becomes slower [ 4 , 14 , 42 ]. In high-temperature regions, movement of electrons increases; however, negatively charged cation vacancies and thermal vibrations of the lattice structure appear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average particle size of Fe 3 O 4 organized into micrometer-sized aggregates on the biomass surface calculated from diffraction peaks (see above) was ca 13 nm, which is consistent with previous results [ 2 ]. It is important to note that upon exposure to O atoms, magnetite oxidizes to maghemite with the partial conversion of Fe 2+ ions into Fe 3+ ions [ 18 ]. The as-synthetized iron oxide particles exhibited a good dispersibility on the biomass surface ( Figure 2 B), and thus, magnetically modified R. squarrosus shows a rapid magnetic response to an external magnetic field, enabling a rapid and selective separation of the biosorbent from aqueous solutions using a permanent magnet [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are highly enticing nanomaterials with greater proportions of accumulation within the brain tumors, which can be conveniently monitored through MRI. For example, iron oxide NPs (e.g., Fe 3 O 4 and Fe 2 O 3 ) can have promising properties, such as biodegradability, non-toxicity, and superparamagnetic features, which facilitate tumor imaging and targeting applications [87,88]. These SPIONs are believed to be the best MRI contrasting agents for glioma imaging, and the suitable therapeutic candidates for magnetism-dependent hyperthermia.…”
Section: Magnetic Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%