2012
DOI: 10.4172/2153-2435.1000160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Estimation of Lopinavir and Ritonavir in Tablets by RP-HPLC Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, only a few analytical techniques have been published for the chromatographic analysis of combination formulation, either separately or together. According to the literature review (Abduljalil & Badhan, 2016;Chiranjeevi & Channabasavaraj, 2011;Ettaboina et al, 2022;Grace & Parthiban, 2022;Jagadeeswaran et al, 2012;Kashish et al, 2020;Kavitha, 2020;Kumar et al, 2016;Lathouwers et al, 2011;Masaaki et al, 2021;Mishra & Shrivastav, 2014;Muchakayala et al, 2022;Pappula & Naresh, 2022;Patel et al, 2013;Paul et al, 2021;Raju et al, 2021;Rezk et al, 2009;Sabyasachi et al, 2021) none of these methods was found suitable for a stability-indicating analysis for quality control use.Thelonger run time used for quantification makes methods time consuming and cost-effective. In general, the technique should be enhanced or its robustness should be proven using the quality by design (QbD) approach, according to the present regulatory criteria, which are unambiguous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, only a few analytical techniques have been published for the chromatographic analysis of combination formulation, either separately or together. According to the literature review (Abduljalil & Badhan, 2016;Chiranjeevi & Channabasavaraj, 2011;Ettaboina et al, 2022;Grace & Parthiban, 2022;Jagadeeswaran et al, 2012;Kashish et al, 2020;Kavitha, 2020;Kumar et al, 2016;Lathouwers et al, 2011;Masaaki et al, 2021;Mishra & Shrivastav, 2014;Muchakayala et al, 2022;Pappula & Naresh, 2022;Patel et al, 2013;Paul et al, 2021;Raju et al, 2021;Rezk et al, 2009;Sabyasachi et al, 2021) none of these methods was found suitable for a stability-indicating analysis for quality control use.Thelonger run time used for quantification makes methods time consuming and cost-effective. In general, the technique should be enhanced or its robustness should be proven using the quality by design (QbD) approach, according to the present regulatory criteria, which are unambiguous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%