1994
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)90071-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative estimation of the level of exposure to gastrointestinal nematode infection in first-year calves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not corroborated by the previous findings [32][33][34]. However, the young animals, having lower level of immunity, are more susceptible to infections than adults [35,36], which may effectively compensate for their shorter exposure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…This is not corroborated by the previous findings [32][33][34]. However, the young animals, having lower level of immunity, are more susceptible to infections than adults [35,36], which may effectively compensate for their shorter exposure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The current serological tests available for the diagnosis of C. oncophora infection are based on CWA. This reduces both the sensitivities and specificities of these tests, particularly in correlating exposure levels in animals with subclinical infections (3,13,(22)(23)(24)(25). Moreover, other conventional diagnostic tests, such as fecal egg count (18) and serum pepsinogen and gastrin level determinations (2,3), are labor intensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastrointestinal (GI) nematode diseases are major obstacles in the production of domestic ruminants (5,18). This especially holds for Cooperia oncophora and Ostertagia ostertagi, the two most common nematodes in cattle in cool temperate regions (14), since they also have a negative economic impact at subclinical infection levels (22)(23)(24)(25). Diagnosis of GI nematode infections or diseases in cattle largely rely on clinical signs, grazing history, and fecal egg counts (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same applies for D. viviparus where the detection of antibodies in serum or milk using ELISAs with either crude ES antigen [ 24 – 26 ] or recombinantly expressed major sperm protein (MSP) [ 27 29 ] has been described. For the detection of C. oncophora , ELISA using crude antigen [ 30 ], or a recombinantly expressed 14.2 kDa ES protein [ 31 ] were reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%