2018
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201711172048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of human activity intensity on the regional ecological impact studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of human activity on the surrounding environment needs to be quantified (Yang et al, 2019). A multi-index superposition system was established based on weights to evaluate the human activity intensity (Liu et al, 2018). Trend analysis and residual analysis were used to calculate the human activity intensity based on MODIS-NDVI data, combining with remote sensing data and regional socioeconomic data (Wen & Yao, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of human activity on the surrounding environment needs to be quantified (Yang et al, 2019). A multi-index superposition system was established based on weights to evaluate the human activity intensity (Liu et al, 2018). Trend analysis and residual analysis were used to calculate the human activity intensity based on MODIS-NDVI data, combining with remote sensing data and regional socioeconomic data (Wen & Yao, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to maintain consistency in time scales, we processed the obtained data and used the Cell Statistics tool in ArcGIS10.8 to synthesize the monthly average temperature and daily temperature range into annual average raster data. [12,44,45] Extreme weather events and severe droughts have recently increased the frequency of wildfires worldwide, leading to more subsequent carbon emissions from fires [35]. According to several recent studies, it also has some surprising effects on notorious air pollution [20,34].…”
Section: Explanatory Variable Meteorological Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the YRD with complex ecosystems, general single indicators to explain the impact of human interference pose a challenge. Following Liu et al [44], we used the degree of human disturbance (DH) to quantify the extent of human damage to nature [20]. In alignment with the distribution standard proposed by Beyhan et al [45], we assigned intensity values to different land use types to quantify the degree of human disturbance to the ecosystem.…”
Section: Vegetation Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Ecological protection function. Human activities are the main factor that puts pressure on ecosystems, so human footprint is used as an indicator to reflect the degree of interfere- ence of human activities on the environment (Liu et al, 2018). National parks protect representative ecosystems and rare species, so the state of ecological protection is reflected by the level and number of state-protected species and the condition of vegetation (Chen et al, 2020c).…”
Section: Function Evaluation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%