1990
DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199009000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Fluorescence Image Analysis in Bladder Cancer Screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PAP is sensitive to high-grade malignancies but is generally insensitive to low-grade tumors [Nelson, 1985]. Various studies suggest an overall sensitivity of 66% for voided urine PAP cytology across the range of grades and stages for transitional cell tumors [Hemstreet et al, 1986], and 3) Quantitative fluorescence image analysis (QFIA) [West, 1965;Bass et al, 1987;Farrow, 1990;Hemstreet et al, 1990] is an evolving technology for quantitating biomarkers in exfoliated cells. This methodology detects early precancerous changes by measuring the amount of DNA or other biomarkers present in exfoliated uroepithelial cells.…”
Section: Dhrs Screening Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAP is sensitive to high-grade malignancies but is generally insensitive to low-grade tumors [Nelson, 1985]. Various studies suggest an overall sensitivity of 66% for voided urine PAP cytology across the range of grades and stages for transitional cell tumors [Hemstreet et al, 1986], and 3) Quantitative fluorescence image analysis (QFIA) [West, 1965;Bass et al, 1987;Farrow, 1990;Hemstreet et al, 1990] is an evolving technology for quantitating biomarkers in exfoliated cells. This methodology detects early precancerous changes by measuring the amount of DNA or other biomarkers present in exfoliated uroepithelial cells.…”
Section: Dhrs Screening Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because quantitative rather than qualitative differences in gene expression and protein levels probably are responsible for most of the differences between malignant and normal phenotypes (13), quantitative fluorescence image analysis was used to quantify a panel of phenotypic markers in single cells from the biopsy specimens. Because of its visual morphologic component, quantitative fluorescence image analysis can link conventional morphologic assessment with quantitative biochemical markers at the single-cell level (14)(15)(16). The markers included quantitative fluorescence image analysis cytology (14), a combination of visual morphologic classification and identifying cells with DNA in excess of 5C (2C = amount of signal equivalent to the diploid chromosome complement), which is a marker for genetic instability; the p300 tumor-related antigen detected by the M344 monoclonal antibody (17); the differentiation-related proteins epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (18,19) and G-actin (the globular monomeric precursor protein to actin filaments); and p185, the product of the HER-2/neu oncogene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] In general, morphometry added objectivity to reports otherwise highly dependent on diagnostic experience. 3 Image cytometry on Feulgen-stained exfoliative material from the bladder introduced the biometric parameter ploidy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%