2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2010.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative functional failure analysis of a thermal–hydraulic passive system by means of bootstrapped Artificial Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that the recommendation of using ANN regression models is mainly based on theoretical considerations about the (mathematically) demonstrated capability of ANN regression models of being universal approximants of continuous nonlinear functions [21] and the experience of the authors' in the use of ANN regression models for propagating the uncertainties through mathematical model codes simulating safety systems [56][57][58][59][60]. Since no further comparisons with other types of regression models have been performed by the authors yet, no additional proofs of the superiority of ANNs with respect to other regression models can be provided at present, in general terms.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis In a Factor Prioritization Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the recommendation of using ANN regression models is mainly based on theoretical considerations about the (mathematically) demonstrated capability of ANN regression models of being universal approximants of continuous nonlinear functions [21] and the experience of the authors' in the use of ANN regression models for propagating the uncertainties through mathematical model codes simulating safety systems [56][57][58][59][60]. Since no further comparisons with other types of regression models have been performed by the authors yet, no additional proofs of the superiority of ANNs with respect to other regression models can be provided at present, in general terms.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis In a Factor Prioritization Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in linear regression, Cribari-Neto [24] and Cribari-Neto and Lima [25] use bootstrapped hypothesis testing and intervals tailored to account for heteroskedasticity with an estimator of the covariance matrix that considers the effects of leverage points in the design matrix. In nonparametric regression, Zio [26], Cadini et al [27], Secchi et al [28] and Zio et al [29] analyze by bootstrap the uncertainty of ANN predictions of nuclear process parameters. In the context of support vector machines, bootstrap approaches have been mainly applied to classification problems [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one side, fast-running surrogate regression models (also called response surfaces or metamodels) can be properly built to mimic the response of the original T-H model code: since the metamodel is, in general, much faster to be evaluated, the problem of long computing times is circumvented. Several kinds of surrogate metamodels have been recently applied to safety-related nuclear, structural and hydrogeological problems, including polynomial Response Surfaces (RSs) [40][41][42][43] , polynomial chaos expansions [44][45][46][47] , stochastic collocations [4 8,4 9] , Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) [50][51][52][53] , Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [54,55] and kriging [56][57][58][59][60][61] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%