2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative genetic analysis of blood pressure reactivity to orthostatic tilt using principal components analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study guaranteed that 30 minutes of tilt and an angle of 60 degrees represent the best available resource to investigate the blood pressure fall [21,23]. Our study also evidenced that BP pressure drop occurred during the first 20 minute period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Another study guaranteed that 30 minutes of tilt and an angle of 60 degrees represent the best available resource to investigate the blood pressure fall [21,23]. Our study also evidenced that BP pressure drop occurred during the first 20 minute period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Family studies have shown that the genetic contribution to the variation of individual blood pressure (BP) reached 23%, 1 and up to 60% shown in research on twins. 2 Epidemiological studies and clinical trials found that high BP is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and also demonstrated the benefits of prevention and treatment strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As clinical data of the participants were not available for this study, the issue of a possible relationship between the substantial initial BP spikes and 'white coat' responses, had to be left to future investigations. Our study adds to other research studies examining blood pressure variability combining genetics, neurobiological factors, and exaggerated stressor-evoked BP reactivity to the prediction of future cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events, placing emphasis on the development of future interventions, both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical [38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%