2010
DOI: 10.1007/12_2009_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Imaging of Concentrated Suspensions Under Flow

Abstract: We review recent advances in imaging the flow of concentrated suspensions, focussing on the use of confocal microscopy to obtain time-resolved information on the single-particle level in these systems. After motivating the need for quantitative (confocal) imaging in suspension rheology, we briefly describe the particles, sample environments, microscopy tools and analysis algorithms needed to perform this kind of experiments. The second part of the review focusses on microscopic aspects of the flow of concentra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
(294 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in the concentrated regime, suspension develops distinct compressive particle normal stress (Deboeuf et al, 2009;Dbouk et al, 2013b), and the apparent viscosity of the mixture increases significantly with the solid volume fraction (Krieger and Dougherty, 1959). No relative slip between the fluid and solid phases for low Reynolds number flows has been measured in this regime to the accuracy of the experimental methods (Lyon and Leal , 1998a;Isa et al, 2010). For yet larger solid volume fraction, approaching the jamming/flowing transition φ → φ m , the apparent viscosity diverges, and a finite frictional yield stress is approached in this limit even when the base fluid is strictly Newtonian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…in the concentrated regime, suspension develops distinct compressive particle normal stress (Deboeuf et al, 2009;Dbouk et al, 2013b), and the apparent viscosity of the mixture increases significantly with the solid volume fraction (Krieger and Dougherty, 1959). No relative slip between the fluid and solid phases for low Reynolds number flows has been measured in this regime to the accuracy of the experimental methods (Lyon and Leal , 1998a;Isa et al, 2010). For yet larger solid volume fraction, approaching the jamming/flowing transition φ → φ m , the apparent viscosity diverges, and a finite frictional yield stress is approached in this limit even when the base fluid is strictly Newtonian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7,8 The simultaneous application of controlled stresses and the visualization of evolving morphologies in bulk materials typically requires confocal microscopes coupled to customized shear cells. 9 The necessity to scan large volumes across the geometry gap limits the range of accessible shear rates or restricts the observation to slices of material in proximity of solid boundaries. 7,10 These limitations can be circumvented by moving from bulk to truly two-dimensional (2D) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there is a need for complementary experimental measurements that bridge these two limits by exploring relatively large volumes with single particle resolution, and that are capable of distinguishing between the various proposed models. Here, by combining fast confocal microscopy (21,22) with simultaneous rheological measurements (21,23), we systematically correlate the real-space microstructure of concentrated hard-sphere suspensions with their flow properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%