2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative interpretation of multiple self-potential anomaly sources by a global optimization approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on the interpretation of SP signals, the most recent updates cover mining exploration and monitoring. A global optimization method based on a Genetic-Price hybrid Algorithm (GPA) has been proposed for identifying the source parameters of SP anomalies (Di Maio et al 2019 ). The approach leads to the interpretation of simple polarized structures, such as spheres, vertical or horizontal cylinders and inclined sheets.…”
Section: Pso Of Other Geophysical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the interpretation of SP signals, the most recent updates cover mining exploration and monitoring. A global optimization method based on a Genetic-Price hybrid Algorithm (GPA) has been proposed for identifying the source parameters of SP anomalies (Di Maio et al 2019 ). The approach leads to the interpretation of simple polarized structures, such as spheres, vertical or horizontal cylinders and inclined sheets.…”
Section: Pso Of Other Geophysical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents the synthetic model parameters, the parameter model bounds for the search spaces and the inversion results from the IMSOS algorithm. Recently, MHAs have succeeded in recovering the model parameters of multiple SP anomaly sources, including BHA [9], PSO [25], the Genetic Prices Algorithm (GPA) [27], Very Fast Simulated Annealing (VFSA) [28], the Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) [10] and the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) [29]. GPA and VFSA need many more forward modeling evaluations for global optimization compared to the other algorithms [9,10,25,29].…”
Section: Self-potential Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the global optimization algorithms can overcome the defects of the gradient algorithms, because they have the capability of jumping out of the local optimum and need not calculate the gradient. Common global optimization algorithms for SP inversion include simulated annealing (Biswas & Sharma, 2014, 2017), neural network (El‐Kaliouby & Al‐Garni, 2009; Li et al., 2019), particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Essa, 2019, 2020; Luo et al., 2021), whale algorithm (Abdelazeem et al., 2019; Gobashy et al., 2020) and genetic algorithm (Di‐Maio et al., 2019; Rani et al., 2019). Among these algorithms, PSO has the advantage of balancing exploration and exploitation effectively, that is, it can guarantee both the global search capability and the convergence speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%